Opportunities and challenges of dialogic pedagogy in art museum education
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this interpretative, qualitative research study is to investigate affordances and constraints of dialogic pedagogy in the museums, as well as its broader contribution to society today. The background is my involvement in a Danish development project called ‘Museums and Cultural Institutions as Spaces for Citizenship,’ initiated by seven art museum educators in Copenhagen and supported by the Ministry of Culture. Denmark has a strong dialogic tradition dating back to Grundtvig’s belief in the power of ´the oral word’ to foster democratic ‘Bildung.’ Museum education, on the other hand, has a long tradition of monologic transmission. Still, a more participatory pedagogy has been gaining ground over many years.
This study is based on the observations of three-hour-long teaching sessions in seven museums and has a Bakhtinian framework. While the overall analysis builds on the whole project, two cases are discussed in more detail. The overarching research question is how central aspects of dialogic pedagogy played out in an art museum context and its opportunities and challenges. The subquestions focus on three central Bakhtinian concepts: How did the educators facilitate multivoicedness during the short museum visits? What role did difference and disagreement play? What opportunities emerged for students to develop internally persuasive discourse? I have chosen these concepts because they are central in dialogism and combined them because they are closely connected in Bakhtin’s work. The final reflections open a wider perspective of how dialogic museum education may contribute to overarching functions of education: qualification, socialization, and subjectification.
Key findings were that the museum educators’ transition from traditional to dialogic pedagogy was enhanced by their genuine interest in hearing students’ voices. They succeeded in engaging students in multivoiced dialogues but with a tendency towards harmonization rather than the exploration of diversity and difference. The practical aesthetic workshops offered unique opportunities for students to develop their internally persuasive word, i.e., by replacing authoritative interpretations of artworks with their own. Challenges experienced by the educators were, e.g., the dilemmas between preplanning and student choice and between disseminating their professional art knowledge and facilitating students’ meaning making and creativity. In contrast, students found the lack of workshop follow-up problematic.
The article provides deeper insight into museums as an alternative pedagogical arena. Museum educators and non-museum classroom teachers may find it useful for cultivating greater dialogic interactions in respective learning contexts.
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
References
Anderson, B. (1991) Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York: Verso.
Alexander, R. (2008) Essays on pedagogy. London & New York: Routledge.
Alexander, R. (2019) Whose discourse? Dialogic Pedagogy for a post-truth world. Dialogic Pedagogy. Vol 7. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2019.268
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin. C. C. Emerson and M. Holquist, trans. M. Holquist, Ed. Austin University Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) Speech genres and other late essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds.; V. W. McGee, trans. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (2004) Dialogic origin and dialogic pedagogy of grammar: Stylistics in teaching Russian language in secondary school. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42 (6), 12-49.
Bernhard, N. & Esbjørn, L. (2013) Teaching in art museums – a brief introduction to the field. In Dysthe, Bernhard & Esbjørn: Dialogue-based teaching. The art museum as a learning space. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, København: Skoletjenesten.
Bialostosky, D. H. (1989) Dialogic, pragmatic, and hermeneutic conversation: Bakhtin, Rorty and Gadamer. Critical Studies,1 (2).
Biesta, G. & Lawy, R. (2006) From teaching citizenship to learning democracy: overcoming individualism in research, policy and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education,36 (1) 63-79.
Biesta, G. J. (2009) On the weakness of education. In Philosophy of Education Yearbook, 354-362.
Biesta, G. (2018). What if? Art education beyond expression and creativity. I C. Naughton, G. Biesta & D. R. Cole (Eds.), Art, Artists and Pedagogy Philosophy and the Arts in Education (s. 11–20). London and New York: Routledge.
Biesta, G. J. (2020) Risking ourselves in education: Qualification, socialization, and subjectification revisited. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411
Børtnes, J. (1999) Bakhtin, dialogen og den andre. O. Dysthe (Ed.) The dialogical perspective and Bakhtin. PLF. University of Bergen.
Desai, D. & Chalmers, G. (2007) Notes for a dialogue on art education in critical times. Art Education, Sept. 2007, 6-12.
Dysthe, O. (1996) Det flerstemmige klasserommet (The multivoiced classroom). Oslo: Abstrakt forlag. Danish translation, Klim, 1996.
Dysthe, O. (1996). The multivoiced classroom: Interactions of writing and classroom discourse. Written Communication, 13 (3), 385- 425.
Dysthe. O. (1999) The dialogical perspective and Bakhtin. O. Dysthe (Ed.) The dialogical perspective and Bakhtin. PLF. University of Bergen.
Dysthe, O. (Ed.) (2002) Dialog, samspel og læring. (Dialogue, interaction and learning). Oslo: Abstrakt Danish translation, Klim Forlag.
Dysthe, O. (2006) Bakhtin og pedagogikken. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 90(6), 456-469.
Dysthe, O. (2012) Opportunity spaces for dialogic pedagogy in a testoriented school. In E. J. White & M. Peters (Eds.) Bakhtinian pedagogy: Opportunities and challenges for research, policy and practice in education across the globe (pp. 69-89). New York: Peter Lang.
Dysthe, O., Bernhardt, N. & Esbjørn, L. (2013) Dialogue-based teaching. The art museum as a learning space. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, København: Skoletjenesten.
Dysthe, O., Kierkegård, P. O, & Ness, I. J. (Eds.). 2020. Dialogisk pædagogik, kreativitet og læring. (Dialogic pedagogy, creativity and learning). Århus: Klim.
Erickson, F. (1986) Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd ed. (pp. 119-161). New York: MacMillan.
Falk, J. H. & Dierking, L. D. (2012) The museum experience revisited. Walnut Creek, Ca.: Left Coast Press.
Hein, G. (2012) Learning in the museum. London/New York: Routledge.
Holquist, M. (1990) Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. London/New York: Routledge.
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000) Museums and the interpretation of visual culture. London/New York: Routledge.
Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage.
Lachman, K. (1988) “Mikhail Bakhtin to Maryse Condé. The problems of literary polyphony”. Borrowed forms. The music and ethics of transnational fiction. http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30243
Laursen, P. F. (2017) Dialog. Realistiske ambitioner for folkeskolen. København: Hans Reitzel.
Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Matusov, E. (2004). Bakhtin’s dialogic pedagogy. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42 (6), 3-11.
Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Matusov, E. (2011) Authorial teaching and learning. In E. J. White & M. Peters (Eds.), Bakhtinian pedagogy: Opportunities and challenges for research, policy and practice in education across the globe (pp. 21-46). New York: Peter Lang.
Matusov, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A., & Gradovski, M. (2019). Dialogic pedagogy and polyphonic research art: Bakhtin by and for educators. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Matusov, E. & von Duyke, K. (2010) Bakhtin’s notion of the internally persuasive discourse in education: Internal to what? Cited from Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2016). “Spoilsport” in drama in education vs. dialogic pedagogy. Dialogic Pedagogy, Vol.4.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage Publications.
Morson, G. S. & Emerson, C. (1990) Mikhail Bakhtin. Creation of a prosaics. Stanford, Ca: Stanford University Press.
Morson, G. S. (2004) The process of ideological becoming. In A. F. Ball & S. W. Freedman (Eds.) Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Ness, I. J. (2017) Polyphonic orchestration – facilitating creative knowledge processes for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20 (4), 557-577. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2016-0049
Ness, I. J. & Dysthe, O. (2020) Polyphonic imagination: Understanding idea generation in multidisciplinary groups as a multivoiced stimulation of fantasy. Creativity Research Journal, 2020.
Nystrand, M. & Gamoran, A. (1991) Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25 (3), 261-290.
Nystrand, M. (with Gamoran, A., Kachur, R., & Prendergast, C.) (1997). Opening dialogue. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Rommetveit, R. (1974) On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. London/New York: Wiley.
Sattrup, L . (2015) Jamen, hvad skal vi kigge efter? - Om at gentænke kunstmuseers demokratiske rolle. En undersøgelse af hvordan undervisningsforløb på kunstmuseer muliggør børns medborgerskab. (But what are we looking for? - Rethinking the democratic role of museums. An investigation of how teaching in art museums enables children’s citizenship.) Ph.d.-dissertation. Institut for samfund og globalisering, Roskilde Universitet/SMK.
Seaton, J. (2018) Why 1984 could be about now (BBC Culture Stories) http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20180507-why-orwells-1984-could-be-about-now
Sidorkin, A. (2009) Beyond Discourse: Education, the self, and dialogue. Suny Press
Villumsen, S. B., Rugaard, D. J. & Sattrup, L. (2014) Rum for medborgerskap. Copenhagen: SMK.
White, E. J. & M. Peters (Eds.), Bakhtinian pedagogy: Opportunities and challenges for research, policy and practice in education across the globe. New York: Peter Lang.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.