Sink or swim? Responsible situated agency constructed by socioeconomically underprivileged students of English in neoliberal Brazil
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article discusses the results of a four-year investigation on the neoliberal challenges faced by socioeconomically underprivileged students in Brazil who were majoring in English teaching. It is a qualitative study that employs the concept of language as a sociocultural and dialogical practice as well as the concepts of responsibility and agency; it also examines the relationship between these students’ experiences and neoliberalism as seen in language education. The data generated by questionnaires, students’ essays, and semi-structured interviews reveal that the participants’ initiatives to engage themselves in outside classroom interactions acted as counter-centralizing forces. By exercising their responsible situated agency towards their English language appropriation process, these participants react against neoliberal challenges viewed here as hierarchical centripetal forces that constrain their access to different kinds of capital. The study participants are also guided by the agency of spaces promoted by discourses marked by decolonial thinking; however, though these students find different ways to negotiate neoliberal challenges, it is still crucial that the faculty in charge of the investigated context build on existing decolonial practices in the classroom. In doing so, more students can become part of “discursive actions” that foster their responsible situated agency towards a more egalitarian society.
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
References
Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109-137.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1999). Toward a Philosophy of the Act. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Base Nacional Comum Curricular. (2018). Retrieved from http://basenacionalcomum.mec.gov.br/
Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (2012). Introduction. In Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (Eds.), Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics (pp. 1-13). New York, NY: Routledge.
Block, D. (2012). Economising globalisation and identity in applied linguistics in neoliberal times. In Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (Eds.), Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics (pp. 56-87). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In Richardson, J. (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp.241-258). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Acts of resistance: Against the new myths of our time. Cambridge, CB: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2008). A economia das trocas linguísticas: o que falar quer dizer. São Paulo, SP: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. (pp. 1-32) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Duff, P. (2014). Case study research on language learning and use. Annual Review on Applied Linguistics, 34, 233-255.
Duff, P. & Anderson, T. (2015). Case study research. In J. D. Brown & C. Coombe (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Language Research. (pp. 112-118) New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Faez, F. (2011). Reconceptualizing the native/non-native speaker dichotomy. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 10, 231-249.
Figueredo, C. J. (2011). O falante nativo de inglês versus o falante não-nativo: representações e percepções em uma sala de aula de inglês. Linguagem & Ensino, 14 (1), 67-92.
Flores, N. (2013). The unexamined relationship between neoliberalism and plurilingualism: A cautionary tale. TESOL QUARTERLY, 47(3), 500-520.
Fontana, A. & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: from structured questions to negotiated text. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of qualitative research. (pp. 645-672) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Holborow, M. (2012). What is neoliberalism? Discourse, ideology and the real world. In Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (Eds.) Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics. (pp. 14-32) New York, NY: Routledge.
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: education as the practice of freedom. New York, NY: Routledge.
Jorge, M. L. S. (2009). Preconceito contra o ensino de língua estrangeira na rede pública. In Lima, D. A. (Ed.), Ensino e Aprendizagem de Língua Inglesa: Conversas com especialistas. (pp. 161-168), São Paulo: SP, Parábola Editorial.
Kelly, W. (2013). Applying a critical metatheoretical approach to intercultural relations: The case of U.S. – Japanese communication. In Agarte, M. K. (Ed.) The Global Intercultural Communication Reader. (pp. 972-1016), Taylor & Francis Group.
Kubota, R. (2015). Race and language learning in multicultural Canada: Towards critical antiracism. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36, 3-12.
Kubota, R., & Miller, E. R. (2017). Re-examining and re-envisioning criticality in language studies: Theories and praxis. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14, 129-157.
Kumaravadivelu. B. (2016). The decolonial option in English teaching: can the subaltern act? TESOL QUARTERLY, 50, 66-85.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Individual identity, cultural globalization and teaching English as an international language: The case for an epistemic break. In Alsagoff, L., McKay, S., Hu, G. & Renandya, W. (Eds.), Teaching English as an International Language: Principles and Practices. (pp. 9-27), New York, NY: Routledge.
Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (2007). Disinventing and reconstituting languages. In Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (Eds.), Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages. (pp. 1-41), New York, NY: Multilingual Matters.
Mateus, E. (2018). Diálogos entre a universidade e a escola na trans(formação) de professores de línguas. In Freitas, C. C., Brossi, G. C., Silva, V. R., & Hermes Junior, A. T. (Eds.) Diálogos entre a universidade e a escola na trans(formação) de professores de línguas. (pp. 23-50), Anápolis: GO, Editora UEG.
Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Contexts: Coloniality is far from over, and so must be decoloniality. Afterall: A Journal of Art, Content and Enquiry, 43, 39-45.
Mignolo, W. D. (2013). Geopolitics of sensing and knowing: On (de)coloniality, border thinking, and epistemic disobedience. Confero, 1 (1), 129–150.
Miller, E. R. (2012). Agency, language learning, and multilingual spaces. Multilingua, 31, 441-468.
Miller, E. R. (2016). The ideology of learner agency and the neoliberal self. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26 (3), 348-365.
Moreira, H. & Caleffe, L. (2006). Metodologia da pesquisa para o professor pesquisador. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: DP&A Editora.
Munro, M. J. (2003). A primer on accent discrimination in the Canadian context. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 20 (2), 38-51.
Noor, K. B. M. (2008). Case study: a strategic research methodology. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5 (11), 1602-1604.
Oliveira, L. A. (2009). Ensino de língua estrangeira para jovens e adultos na escola pública. In D. C. Lima (Ed.), Ensino e Aprendizagem de Língua Inglesa (pp. 21-30), São Paulo, SP: Parábola Editorial.
Park, G. (2012). "I am never afraid of being recognized as an NNES": One teacher's journey in claiming and embracing her nonnative-speaker. TESOL Quarterly, 46 (1), 127-151.
Park, J. S. (2011). The promise of English: linguistic capital and the neoliberal worker in the South Korean job market. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14 (4), 443-455.
Pennycook, A. (2007). The myth of English as an international language. In Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (Eds.). Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages (pp. 90-115), New York, NY: Multilingual Matters.
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Phillipson, R. (2008). The linguistic imperialism of neoliberal empire. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 5 (1), 1-43.
Pitman, T. (2013). ‘Miraculous exceptions’: what can autobiography tell us about why some disadvantaged students succeed in higher education? Higher Education Research & Development, 32 (1), 30–42.
Rajagopalan, K. (1997). Linguistics and the myth of nativity: comments on the controversy over “new/non-native Englishes”. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 225-231.
Rivers, D. J. & Ross, A. S. (2013). Idealized English teachers: The implicit influence of race in Japan. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 12, 321-339.
Saad-Filho, A. & Morais, Lecio. (2018). Brazil: Neoliberalism versus democracy. London: Pluto Press.
Sayer, P. (2015). “More & earlier”: Neoliberalism and primary English education in Mexican public schools. L2 Journal, 7 (3), 40-56.
Selvi, A. F. (2014). Myths and misconceptions about nonnative English speakers in the TESOL (NNEST) Movement. TESOL Journal, 5 (3), 573-611.
Silvestre, V. P. V. (2017). Colaboração e crítica na formação de professores/as de línguas: teorizações construídas em uma experiência com o PIBID. São Paulo: Pontes Editores.
Vandrick, S. (2009). ESL and the colonial legacy: A teacher faces her ‘missionary kid’ past. In Vandrick, S. Interrogating Privilege: Reflections of a Second Language Educator. (pp. 21-35), Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner: Ethnography and second-language classroom research. London: Longman.
Vološinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiann, 9, 1-6.