Main Article Content
In this reflective paper, I respond to Dr. Matusov’s (2020) eloquent philosophical exploration of “students’ right to freedom of education. In doing so, I pursue a narrative inquiry (Bruner, 1987; Clandinin, Murphy, Huber, & Orr, 2010; Clandinin, 2013; Hong, Falter, & Fecho, 2017) to explore my students’ self-generated meanings of their educational freedom in our teacher education classroom. I wonder whether freedom of education can be presented as a transcendental concept of self-examination and taught as the student’s right for it without a critical deconstruction of the tentious and fictitious materiality of freedom. Also, I wonder what my students think when they are provoked to claim their right to freedom of education. This reflection reveals that students’ right of freedom is not necessarily about their own self-examination, freedom is a creative force of self-expression. More specifically, freedom is the self-conscious act of discovery of itself (i.e., freedom) in everything my students do as a part of their classroom learning and education. All in all, freedom does not have any meaning at all since meaning emerges in the act of freedom itself, or rather in the creative act of being free.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
Bakhtin, M. (1965). Rabelais and his world. Indiana University Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Barrett, S.E., Solomon, R.P., Singer, J.M., Portelli, J.P., & Mujuwamariya, D. (2009). The hidden curriculum of a teacher induction program: Ontario teacher educators' perspectives. Canadian Journal of Education, 32(4), 677-702.
Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54(1), 11-32.
Clandinin, D.J., Murphy, S., Huber, J., & Orr, A. (2010). Negotiating narrative inquiries: Living in a tension-filled mist. Journal of Educational Research, 103(2), 81-90.
Clandinin, D. J. (2013). Engaging in narrative inquiry. Routledge.
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act. (1982). https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-15.html
Estefan, A., Caine, V., & Clandinin, D. J. (2016). At the intersection of narrative inquiry and professional education. Narrative Works, 6(1), 15-37.
Hong, X., Falter, M., & Fecho, B. (2016). Embracing tension: Using Bakhtinian theory as a means for data analysis. Qualitative Research, 17(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116653800
Kanellopoulos, P. (2011). Freedom and responsibility: The aesthetics of free musical improvisation and its educational implications—a view from Bakhtin. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 19(2), 113-135. doi:10.2979/philmusieducrevi.19.2.113
Klee, P. (1964). The diaries of Paul Klee: 1898-1918. University of California Press.
Matusov, E. (2020). A student’s and a teacher’s right to freedom of education. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 8 (2020), SF1-SF28. doi:10.5195/dpj.2020.356.
Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2017). Promoting students’ ownership of their own education through critical dialogue and democratic self-governance. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 5, E1-29. doi: 10.5195/dpj.2017.199
McCoubrey, S., & Sitch, G. (2002). The Charter in the classroom: Students, teachers, and rights. http://www.thecharterrules.ca/index.php?main=concepts&concept=5
McGraw, L., Zvonkovic, A., & Walker, A. (2000). Studying postmodern families: A feminist analysis of ethical tensions in work and family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(1), 68-77. www.jstor.org/stable/1566688
Parker, C. & Bickmore, K. (2012). Conflict management and dialogue with diverse immigrant students: Novice teachers’ approaches and concerns. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 47–64.
Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 923-949). Sage.
Ricci, C. (2005). Rewarding the obedient: What is really being taught at the faculties of education? An experiential account. Journal of Pre-Service Education, 1-11. https://faculty.nipissingu.ca/carlor/files/2013/02/RewardingTheObedient.pdf
Schapiro, M. (1972). The education of women as artists: Project womanhouse. Art Journal, 31(3), 268-270
Stensaeth, K. (2015). “Musical dialoguing:” A perspective of Bakhtin’s dialogue on musical improvisation in asymmetric relations. Nordic Research in Music Education, 16, 209-225.
Wells, K. (2011). Narrative inquiry. Oxford University Press.
Williams, R. (1989). Resources of hope: Culture, democracy, socialism. Verso.