Free Will and Heutagogy

Main Article Content

Raz Shpeizer
Amnon Glassner


In this paper we argue that there are at least two conditions for the adequate realization of the capacity of free will – and thus of the realization of the right to freedom of education – that are missing from Matusov's account, and needed to be integrated with it in order to enable the successful implementation of the right to freedom of education principle. We will then offer a different typology of the field of education, a typology that is complementary, rather than contradictory, to Matusov's typology, and use this typology – especially the concept of heutagogy – to offer a way that optimizes freedom of will in education

Article Details

How to Cite
Shpeizer, R., & Glassner, A. (2020). Free Will and Heutagogy. Dialogic Pedagogy: A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education, 8, SF80-SF86.
Special Issue: Students’ Freedom of Education
Author Biography

Amnon Glassner, Kaye Academic College of Education

Senior Lecturer in Kaye  Academic College education: Teach expereince and research the topic of: 

argumentation (anti logus). creative thinking in learning and teaching, Heutagogy (self-detremined learning) ICT in learning and teaching, pbl (project based learning)


Berofsky, B. (2009). Liberation from self: A theory of personal autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Blaschke, L. M, Kenyon., C. & Hase. S. (Eds.) (2014), Experiences in self-determined learning (pp. 84–96). Kindle Edition: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational

Leadership 43(2): 44–48.

Ginet, C. (1996). In defense of the principle of alternative possibilities: Why I don't find Frankfurt's arguments convincing. Philosophical Perspectives, 10, 403-417.

Glassner, A. & Back, S. (2020). Exploring heutagogy in higher education - academia meets the zeitgeist. Springer Nature, Singapore.

Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. Ultibase Articles, 5(3), 1–10.

Kane, R. (1996). The significance of free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kane, R. (2005). A contemporary introduction to free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Knowles, S. M. (1970). The modern practice of adult education. New York: Association Press.

Knowles, S. M. (1980). The modern practice of adult education (revised and updated ed.). Chicago: Follett Publishing Company.

Matusov, E. (2020). A student’s right to freedom of education. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 8 (2020), SF1-SF28. doi:10.5195/dpj.2020.356.

Murray, D. & Lombrozo, T. (2017). Effects of manipulation on attributions of causation, free will, and moral responsibility. Cognitive Science, 41, 447–481, doi: 10.1111/cogs.12338

Luckin, R., Clark, W., Garnett, F., Whitworth, A., Akass, J., & Cook, J. (2010). Learner-generated contexts: A framework to support the effective use of technology for learning. In M. Lee & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 70–84). Hershey: IGI Global.

Paul, R. W. (1993). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Pereboom, D. (2014). Free will, agency, and meaning in life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shoemaker, D. (2015). Ecumenical attributability. In R. Clarke, M. McKenna & A. Smith (Eds.), The nature of moral responsibility (pp. 115-140). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Retrieved from: Retrieved from:”

Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking, and education. New York: Routledge.

Siemens, G. (2008). Learning and knowing in networks: Changing roles for educators and designers. Presented to ITFORUM for Discussion. Retrieved from: