A student’s right to freedom of education

Main Article Content

Eugene Matusov


This conceptual essay, which opens the special issue, examines why a student’s right to freedom of education – the right for a student to define their own education – is so crucial for the education itself. Four diverse educational approaches are considered: training, closed socialization, open socialization, and critical examination, along with the Bakhtinian dialogic pedagogy to reveal the need for freedom of education within each of the approaches and the pedagogy. The eight aspects of the right to freedom are explicated. Three major objections against the right are considered and rebuked: 1) the Kantian paradox of autonomy and paternalism in education, 2) the paradox of learning and ignorance, and 3) fear of non-participation in education without coercion. The legitimate limitations of the right are discussed. Finally, the two major pathways to the right – radical and gradual – are analyzed.

I sent the earlier draft of the paper to the Dialogic Pedagogy journal community, asking for critical commentaries. Many people submitted their critical commentaries involving their agreements, disagreements, associative readings, extensions, evaluations, and so on. My paper, their commentaries constitute this special, and my reply constitutes this special issue. Three people – David Kirshner, Belkacem TAIEB, and Jim Rietmulder – chose to provide commentaries on the margins. I included most of their comments on the margins as a new genre to promote a critical dialogue in our readers. Also, Belkacem TAIEB and Matthew Shumski submitted short commentaries that I included, below, at the end of this article as Appendix I and II. Jim Cresswell shared the manuscript with his undergraduate psychology students, and one student volunteered to add her commentary. Shelly Price-Jones shared it with her international undergraduate students studying English at a South Korean university. Twenty-one of them chose to provide a video reply. I selected a few of them that attracted my attention. Finally, I chose to address some of the issues brought in the presented critical commentaries either as my reply on the margins or at the end of this special issue. This should not be taken as “the final word” in the debate, but rather a dialogic response inviting other responses in the authors and in the audience.

Article Details

How to Cite
Matusov, E. (2020). A student’s right to freedom of education. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 8, SF1-SF28. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2020.356
Special Issue: Students’ Freedom of Education
Author Biography

Eugene Matusov, School of Education University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States

Professor of Education
School of Education
University of Delaware


Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays (V. Liapunov, Trans. 1st ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1991). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act (V. Liapunov, Trans. 1st ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1999). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (2004). Dialogic origin and dialogic pedagogy of grammar: Stylistics in teaching Russian language in secondary school. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42(6), 12-49.

Berlin, I., & Hardy, H. (2002). Freedom and its betrayal: Six enemies of human liberty. Princeton, N.J. Chichester: Princeton University Press.

Biesta, G. (2007). Foundations of democratic education: Kant, Dewey, and Arendt. In R. v. d. Veen, D. Wildemeersch, J. Youngblood, & V. Marsick (Eds.), Democratic practices as learning opportunties (pp. 7-17). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Caplan, B. D. (2018). The case against education: Why the education system is a waste of time and money. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Carr, W. (2006). Philosophy, methodology and action research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(4), 421-435.

Cobban, A. B. (1980). Student power in the Middle Ages. History Today, 30(2). Retrieved from http://www.historytoday.com/alan-b-cobban/student-power-middle-ages

Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.

Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum and the school and society (Combined ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Douglas, J. D. (1991). Only freedom of education can solve America's bureaucratic crisis of education. Retrieved from https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa155.pdf

Duberman, M. B. (1969). An Experiment in Education. In M. B. Duberman (Ed.), The uncompleted past (pp. 259-294). New York, NY: Random House.

Duberman, M. B. (2009). Black Mountain: An exploration in community. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Freire, P. (1986). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Gates, L. (2020, in press). Collaborative inquiry: Searching for ways to be a feminist educator in a university context. In K. Keifer-Boyd, L. Hoeptner-Poling, S. Klein, W. B. Knight, & A. P. d. Miles (Eds.), Lobby Activism. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.

Gee, J. (2015). Discourse, small d, big D. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of language and social interaction (First Edition. ed., pp. 418–422). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Greenberg, D. (1991). Free at last: The Sudbury Valley School. Framingham, MA: Sudbury Valley School Press.

Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105-2108.

Jerome, J. (1970). Culture out of anarchy: The reconstruction of American higher learning. New York: Herder and Herder.

Jones, G. H. (1971). Post mortem: Student-directed courses I and II. College English, 33(3), 284-293.

Kant, I. (1784). An answer to the question: What is Enlightenment? Retrieved from https://www.stmarys-ca.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/files/Kant--What%20Is%20Enlightenment_.pdf

Karsten, S. (2006). Freedom of education and common civic values. European Education, 38(2), 23-35.

Kelly, A. (1978). Introduction: A complex vision. In I. Berlin, H. Hardy, & A. Kelly (Eds.), Russian thinkers (pp. xiii-xxiv). London: Hogarth Press.

Kukathas, C. (2001). Passing the unexamined life. Quadrant, 45(7), 22-24.

Kukathas, C. (2003). The liberal archipelago: A theory of diversity and freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

LaVaque-Manty, M. (2006). Kant's children. Social Theory and Practice, 32(3), 365-388.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp.

Llewellyn, G. (1998). The teenage liberation handbook: How to quit school and get a real life and education (Rev., 2nd ed ed.). Eugene, OR: Lowry House.

Markoff, J. (2015). Machines of loving grace: The quest for common ground between humans and robots. New York: HarperCollins.

Martini, M. (1994). Peer interactions in Polynesia: A view from the Marquesas. In J. L. Roopnarine, J. E. Johnson, & F. H. Hooper (Eds.), Children’s play in diverse cultures (pp. 73-103). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

Matusov, E. (2011a). Authorial teaching and learning. In E. J. White & M. Peters (Eds.), Bakhtinian pedagogy: Opportunities and challenges for research, policy and practice in education across the globe (pp. 21-46). New York: Peter Lang Publishers.

Matusov, E. (2011b). Irreconcilable differences in Vygotsky’s and Bakhtin’s approaches to the social and the individual: An educational perspective. Culture & Psychology, 17(1), 99-119.

Matusov, E. (2015a). Four Ages of our relationship with the Reality: An educationalist perspective. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(1), 61-83. doi:10.1080/00131857.2013.860369

Matusov, E. (2015b). Legitimacy of non-negotiable imposition in diverse approaches to education. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 3, A174-A211. Retrieved from http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/110/105

Matusov, E. (2020a). Dialogic analysis of the teacher’s pedagogical decision-making in a lesson on the educational controversies of religious holidays in a dialogic multi-regime college classroom. In M. C. Oliveira, A. U. Branco, & S. F. Freire (Eds.), Psychology as a Dialogical Science: Self and culture mutual development (pp. 29-50). New York: Springer International Publishing.

Matusov, E. (2020b). Envisioning education in a post-work leisure-based society: A dialogic perspective. New York: Palgrave.

Matusov, E. (2020c). Pattern-recognition, intersubjectivity, and dialogic meaning-making in education (Editorial). Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 8, E1-E24. doi:10.5195/dpj.2020.314

Matusov, E. (2020, submitted). Progressive Education is the opium of the educators. Educational Philosophy and Theory.

Matusov, E., Baker, D., Fan, Y., Choi, H. J., & Hampel, R. L. (2017). Magic Learning Pill: Ontological and instrumental learning in order to speed up education. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(3), 456–476. doi:10.1007/s12124-017-9384-8

Matusov, E., & Hayes, R. (2000). Sociocultural critique of Piaget and Vygotsky. New Directions in Psychology, 18(2-3), 215-239.

Matusov, E., & Lemke, J. L. (2015). Values in dialogic pedagogy (Editorial). Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 3, E1-E20. doi:0.5195/dpj.2015.141

Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2012). Diverse Approaches to Education: Alienated Learning, Closed and Open Participatory Socialization, and Critical Dialogue. Human Development, 55(3), 159-166. doi:10.1159/000339594

Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2015). Typology of critical dialogue and power relations in Democratic Dialogic Education. In K. Jezierska & L. Koczanowicz (Eds.), Democracy in dialogue, dialogue in democracy (pp. 211-229). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2016a). Dialogic authorial approach to creativity in education: Transforming a deadly homework into a creative activity. In V. P. Glăveanu (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research (pp. 307-325). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2016b). The State’s Educational Neutrality: Radical proposal for educational pluralism (Editorial). Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 4, E1-E26. doi:10.5195/dpj.2016.170

Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2017a). Promoting students’ ownership of their own education through critical dialogue and democratic self-governance. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 5, E1-E29. doi:10.5195/dpj.2017.199

Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2017b). Promoting students’ ownership of their own education through critical dialogue and democratic self-governance (Editorial). Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 5, E1-E29. doi:10.5195/dpj.2017.199

Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2019). Intrinsic education and its discontents. In L. Tateo (Ed.), Educational dilemmas: A cultural psychological perspective (pp. 21-40). New York: Routledge.

Matusov, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A., & Gradovski, M. (2019). Dialogic pedagogy and polyphonic research art: Bakhtin by and for educators: Palgrave Macmillan.

Matusov, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A., & Meacham, S. (2016). Pedagogical voyeurism: Dialogic critique of documentation and assessment of learning. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 5(1), 1-26. doi:10.17583/ijep.2016.1886

Matusov, E., & von Duyke, K. (2010). Bakhtin’s notion of the Internally Persuasive Discourse in education: Internal to what? (A case of discussion of issues of foul language in teacher education). In K. Junefelt & P. Nordin (Eds.), Proceedings from the Second International Interdisciplinary Conference on perspectives and limits of dialogism in Mikhail Bakhtin Stockholm University, Sweden June 3-5, 2009 (pp. 174-199). Stockholm: Stockholm University.

Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Mapping concepts of agency in educational contexts. integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 420–446. doi:10.1007/s12124-015-9334-2

Neill, A. S. (1960). Summerhill: A radical approach to child rearing. New York: Hart Publishing Company.

Pető, A. (2018). Attack on freedom of education in Hungary: The case of gender studies. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/gender/2018/09/24/attack-on-freedom-of-education-in-hungary-the-case-of-gender-studies/

Phillips, C. (2002). Socrates café: A fresh taste of philosophy. New York: W.W. Norton.

Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Plato, & Bluck, R. S. (1961). Meno. Cambridge, UK: University Press.

Plato, & Riddell, J. (1973). The Apology of Plato, with a revised text and English notes, and a digest of Platonic idioms. New York: Arno Press.

Reardon, J., & Mollin, D. (2009). Ch-ch-ch-changes: Artists talk about teaching. London: Ridinghouse.

Rietmulder, J. (2019). When kids rule the school: The power and promise of democratic education. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.

Rietmulder, J., & The Circle School. (2015). Circle School graduates in 2015: College attendance, academic degrees, and occupations. Retrieved from https://www.circleschool.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Circle-School-Grads-in-2015-July-30-2015.pdf

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rumel, J. (2013). Back to the future: The in loco parentis doctrine and its impact on whether K-12 schools and teachers owe a fiduciary duty to students. Indiana Law Review, 46(3), 711-751. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2771309

Schaefer-Simmern, H. (1948). The unfolding of artistic activity, its basis, processes, and implications. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Shor, I. (1996). When students have power: Negotiating authority in a critical pedagogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Sidorkin, A. M. (1999). Beyond discourse: Education, the self, and dialogue. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Sidorkin, A. M. (2002). Learning relations: Impure education, deschooled schools, & dialogue with evil. New York: P. Lang.

Sidorkin, A. M. (2009). Labor of learning: Market and the next generation of education reform. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Skenazy, L. (2009). Free-range kids: Giving our children the freedom we had without going nuts with worry (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Tolstoy, L. (1967). Tolstoy on education (L. Wiener, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Tolstoy, L., & Blaisdell, R. (2000). Tolstoy as teacher: Leo Tolstoy's writings on education. New York: Teachers & Writers Collaborative.

Tompkins, J. P. (1996). A life in school: What the teacher learned. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.

Varjo, J., Kalalahti, M., & Silvennoinen, H. (2014). Families, school choice, and democratic iterations on the right to education and freedom of education in Finnish municipalities. Journal of School Choice, 8(1), 20-48.

von Duyke, K. (2013). Students' agency, autonomy, and emergent learning interests in two open democratic schools. (PhD). Univrsity of Delaware,