Leadership learning design principles: Co-creating dialogic and critical pedagogy within cohort and community contexts
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to share our pedagogical evolution as graduate faculty in relationship with increasingly diverse cohort communities of early childhood professionals learning across the landscape of leadership roles engaged with young children, families, and other adults. The early childhood leadership program described in this paper offers a graduate certificate where annually, a cohort of 18-22 early childhood professionals from across Colorado in the United States learn together for 13 months. As faculty, we share a strong commitment to both learning about our teaching and to inviting student voices, the early childhood professionals, through dialogic processes in participatory study as we co-learn and grow our practices of learning and teaching. This paper introduces and explores four leadership learning design principles: (1) identity and agency, (2) socially constructed pedagogy, (3) contextually relevant learning experience, and (4) appreciative stance. As we go, the story will unfold around how we engaged cohort members of the 2019-2020 program year through initial survey reflections and then deepening our shared understanding of these leadership learning design principles through iterations of dialogue after the program was concluded. We end the paper with reflections on how this process of study has ultimately brought us to an awareness and eagerness to engage in relational forms of inquiry, placing student voices at the center with even more intention and depth.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
References
Bloch, M.N., Swadener, B.B., & Cannella, G.S. (Eds.). (2018). Reconceptualizing Early Childhood Education and Care--A Reader: Critical questions, new imaginaries & social activism (2nd Edition). New York: Peter Lang.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. London: SAGE.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: SAGE.
DeFehr, J.N., Infante, C.L.S. & Valladares, C.I.L. (2021). Dialogic social inquiry: Qualitative research without a methodological map. Chagrin Falls: OH: Taos Institute Publications.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience & Education. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Dugan, J.P. (2017). Leadership theory: Cultivating critical perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Duncan-Andrade, J. M. R., & Morrell, E. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools. New York: Peter Lang.
Felten, P., Bagg, J., Bumbry, M., Hill, J., Hornsby, K., Pratt, M. & Weller, S. (2013). A call for expanding inclusive student engagement in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp. 63–74.
Freire, P. (2015). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: NY. Bloomsbury Academic.
Frank, A.W. (2010). Letting stories breathe: A socio-narratology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
González N., Moll L.C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.) (2009) Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. New York: Routledge.
Harro, B. (2018). The cycle of liberation. In Adams, M., Blumenfeld, W.J., Castaneda, C., Hackman, H.W., Peters, M.L. & Zuniga, X. Readings for diversity and social justice. NY and London: Routledge.
Harvard University, Graduate School of Education: Project Zero. (2016). Project Zero. www.pz.harvard.edu
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York, NY: Routledge.
Johnson, A. (2018). Privilege, power, and difference. 3rd Edition. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Lambert, L., Zimmerman, D. P. & Gardner, M.E. (2016). Liberating leadership capacity: Pathways to educational wisdom. NY: Teachers College Press.
Lambert, L., Walker, D., Zimmerman, D.P., Cooper, J.E., Lambert, M.D., Gardner, M.E. & Szabo, M. (2002). The constructivist leader. NY: Teachers College Press.
Lenette, C., Stavropoulou, N., Nunn, C., Kong, S.T., Cook, T., Coddington, K., & Banks, S. (2019). Brushing under the carpet: Examining the complexities of participatory research. Research for All, 3 (2), 161-179.
Long, S., Souto-Manning, M. & Vasquez, V. M. (Eds). (2016) Courageous leadership in early childhood education: Taking a stand for social justice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Martins, P.P.S. & Arantes, M. (2019). Learning social constructionism: Students’ understandings of transformations in their lives. International Journal of Collaborative-Dialogic Practices, 9 (1), pp. 120-130.
McNamee S. & Hosking D.M. (2012). Research and Social Change: A relational constructionist approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
Michael Morris, S. & Stommel, J. (2018). An urgency of teachers. Creative Commons. https://criticaldigitalpedagogy.pressbooks.com/
Moss, P. (2019). Alternative narratives in early childhood: An introduction for students and practitioners. New York: Routledge.
National Association for the Education of Young Children (2019). Advancing equity in early childhood education position statement. Washington, DC. https://www.naeyc.org/resources/position-statements/equity
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24783.
Nxumalo, F. & Brown, C.P. (Eds.). (2020). Disrupting and countering deficits in early childhood education. New York: Routledge.
Ospina, S.M., & Foldy, E. (2009). A critical review of race and ethnicity in the leadership literature: Surfacing context, power and the collective dimensions of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(6), pp. 876–896.
Ospina, S.M., Foldy. E.G., El Hadidy, W., Dodge, J., Hoffman-Pinella, A. & Su, C. (2012). Social change leadership as relational leadership. In M. Uhl-Bien & S.M. Ospina (Eds.), Advancing relational leadership research: A dialogue among perspectives (pp. 255-302). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Relational Research Network, The Taos Institute. Online Community Home Page: https://taoslearning.ning.com/groups2/global-relational-research-network
Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching, and learning. London and New York: Routledge.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Senge, P., Scharmer, O., Jaworski, J., & Flowers, B.S. (2005). Presence: Human purpose and the field of the future. Cambridge, MA: Random House.
Shah, T.A. & Rashid, S. (2017). Applying Vygotsky to adult learning. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), pp. 1-13.
University of Colorado Denver, School of Education and Human Development. (2020). Digital Pedagogy Lab. www.digitialpedagogylab.com
Vecchi, V. (2010). Art and creativity in Reggio Emilia: Exploring the role and potential of ateliers in early education. London and New York: Routledge.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Wheatley, M. & Frieze, D. (2011). Walk out, walk on. San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
Whitney, D. & Trosten-Bloom, A. (2010). The power of appreciative inquiry: A practical guide to positive change. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Whitney, D., Trosten-Bloom, A, & Rader, K. (2010). Appreciative leadership: Focus on what works to drive winning performance and build a thriving organization McGraw Hill.
Wilson, P. (2019). The heart of community engagement. New York: Routledge.
Wood, L. (2020). Participatory action learning and action research. London: Routledge.