Dialogues in education: Exploring cases from music and mathematics education

Main Article Content

Hanne Rinholm
Ida Heiberg Solem
Inger Ulleberg

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore how aspects of dialogic teaching are concretized in classrooms to fill the gap between educational rhetoric and classroom practices. A central competency needed in our time is the ability to participate in democratic dialogue. Education for democratic citizenship can be connected to the notion of “becoming human,” which is a central idea in the Bildung dimension of education. The national educational regulations in Norway state that the teacher’s mandate is not limited to conveying knowledge and skills but also includes fostering the students’ critical reflection, inquisitiveness, and participation. The research questions that guided the study are: What theoretical concepts can be helpful in understanding and analyzing dialogic classroom practices? How can participation be promoted through dialogic classroom practice? How do the dimensions of ontological and epistemological dialogue appear in educational settings, and how do they interact with each other? Methodologically, the article presents, analyzes, and discusses two cases from different educational settings: pre-service teacher education music courses and upper-primary-level mathematics education. The findings show that the chosen theoretical concepts of mathematizing, musicking, and Bildung, as well as ontological and epistemological dialogue, are helpful in making sense of dialogic classroom practices.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rinholm, H., Solem, I. H., & Ulleberg, I. (2023). Dialogues in education: Exploring cases from music and mathematics education. Dialogic Pedagogy: A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education, 11(1), A60-A84. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2023.458
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Hanne Rinholm, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway

Hanne Rinholm (previously Fossum) is a Professor of Music at the Faculty of Education and International Studies, Oslo Metropolitan University. Since 2018, she has been leading the multidisciplinary research group Teacher Education as a Process of Bildung at Oslo Metropolitan University and has been Program Co-Chair for the International Society of Philosophy of Music Education Symposium 2017–2023. She has published on topics such as musical-aesthetic experience, dialogue in education, democratic citizenship, critical reflection, and teachers’ professional diversity competences.

Ida Heiberg Solem, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway

Ida Heiberg Solem is Associate Professor Emerita in the Faculty of Education and International Studies, Oslo Metropolitan University. She is engaged in the topic of communication in the mathematical classroom, and her research interests comprise the exploration of the students’ questioning, reasoning, arguing and justifying mathematical ideas and concepts. Solem has written several textbooks for teacher students and teachers in Norwegian, as well as research articles such as “Which questions should be asked in classroom talks in mathematics” (with Inger Ulleberg) and “Aspects of a teacher’s mathematical knowledge in his orchestration of a discussion about rational numbers” (with Bodil Kleve).

Inger Ulleberg, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway

Inger Ulleberg is Professor Emerita at the Faculty of Education and International Studies at Oslo Metropolitan University. Her research interests are connected to communication between teacher and students in the classroom as well as between counselor and teacher in counseling processes. Ulleberg has published research articles, book chapters, and textbooks on these questions, such as “Which questions should be asked in classroom talks in mathematics” (with Ida Heiberg Solem), “Asking Questions in Supervision” (with Per Jensen), “What do I share – Personal and Private Experiences in Educational Psychological Counselling” (with Heidi Mjelve and Kristin Vonheim).

References

Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Dialogos Cambridge.

Alexander, R. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: Genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561–598.

Alexander, R. (2020). A dialogic teaching companion. Routledge.

Åsvoll, H. (2006). Hvordan fortolke Bakhtins dialog? [How to interpret Bakhtin’s dialogue?]. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift 06, 90, s.445–455.

Åsvoll, H. (2006). Hvordan fortolke Bakhtins dialog? [How to interpret Bakhtin’s dialogue?]. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 06, 90, 445–455.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.; M. Holquist, Ed.). University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. (C. Emerson, Ed. & Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.

Barnes, D. (2008). Exploratory talk for learning. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school: Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes (pp. 1–16). Sage Publications.

Barnett, R. (2005). Recapturing the universal in the university. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(6), 785–797.

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Ballantine Books.

Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity (Vol. 255). Bantam Books.

Bergem, O. K., & Klette, K. (2012). Samtaler som læringsverktøy i matematikk: Hva lærer elevene? [Dialogues used as learning tools in mathematics: What do the pupils learn?]. In T. N. Hopfenbeck, M. Kjærnsli, & R. V. Olsen (red.), Kvalitet i norsk skole. [Quality in Norwegian schools]. Universitetsforlaget.

Biesta, G. (2014). The beautiful risk of education. Routledge.

Biesta, G. (2015). Hvad skal vi gøre med børnene? Om uddannelse, modstand og dialogen mellem barn og verden. [What are we going to do with the children? On education, resistance, and the dialogue between the children and the world]. In J. Klitmøller & D. Sommer (Eds.), Læring, dannelse og udvikling [Learning, education and development] (pp. 105–122). Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Boaler, J., & Brodie, K. (2004). The importance, nature and impact of teacher questions. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 774–782).

Bollnow, O. F. (1959). Existenzphilosophie und Pädagogik. Versuch über unstetige Formen der Erziehung [Existential Philosophy and Education. A study on discontinuous forms of education]. Kohlhammer.

Bollnow, O. F. (1972). Encounter and education. In D. Vandenberg (Trans.), Educational forum (Vol. 36, pp. 303–312, 465–472).

Brendefur, J., & Frykholm, J. (2000). Promoting mathematical communication in the classroom: Two preservice teachers’ conceptions and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(2), 125–153.

Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics 1970–1990. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Chase, S. E. (2005). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.

Christensen, H., & Ulleberg, I. (Eds.). (2013). Klasseledelse, fag og danning. [Classroom leadership, subject and Bildung]. Gyldendal Akademisk.

Core Curriculum (2020). Core curriculum – Values and principles for primary and secondary education. https://www.udir.no/lk20/overordnet-del/?lang=eng

Dall’Alba, G., & Barnacle, R. (2007). An ontological turn for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 679–691.

Dewey, J. (1926). Democracy and education. MacMillan.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. MacMillan.

Dysthe, O. (1993). Det flerstemmige klasserommet. [The multi-voiced classroom]. Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.

Dysthe, O. (1999). Mikhail Bakhtin - en kort presentasjon [Mikhail Bakhtin – A short presentation]. In O. Dysthe (Ed.), The dialogical perspective and Bakhtin: Conference report (pp. 6–17). University of Bergen.

Dysthe, O. (2001). Sosiokulturelle teoriperspektiv på kunnskap og læring. [Socio-cultural theoretical perspectives on knowledge and learning]. In O. Dysthe (Ed.), Dialog, samspel og læring [Dialogue, interaction and learning] (pp. 33–72). Abstrakt Forlag.

Dysthe, O. (2006). Bakhtin og pedagogikken - Kva ein tidlegare ukjend artikkel fortel om Bakhtins pedagogiske praksis. [Bakhtin and education – what an hitherto unknown article can tell us about Bakhtin’s pedagogical practice]. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 90(6), 456–469.

Dysthe, O. (2012). Teoretiske perspektiver på dialog og dialogbasert undervisning [Theoretical perspectives on dialogue and dialogue-based teaching]. In O. Dysthe, N. Bernhardt, & L. Esbjørn (Eds.), Dialogbasert undervisning [Dialogue-based teaching] (pp. 45–80). Fagbokforlaget.

Dysthe, O. (2020). Lærerens betydning og rolle i dialogisk pædagogik: Casestudie fra en præstationsorienteret skolevirkelighed. [The teacher’s prominence and role in dialogic pedagogy: A case study from a performance–oriented school reality]. In O. Dysthe, I. J. Ness, & P. O. Kirkegaard (Eds.), Dialogisk pædagogik, kreativitet og læring [Dialogic pedagogy, creativity, and learning] (pp. 143–175). Forlaget Klim.

Education Act (1998). Act relating to primary and secondary education and training. Lovdata. https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/1998-07-17-61?q=education%20act

Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why Doesn’t This Feel Empowering? Working Through the Repressive Myths of Critical Pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review 59 (3): 297–324.

Fossland, J. (2004). Wilhelm von Humboldt: Dannelse og frihet - det moderne universitetet [Wilhelm von Humboldt: Bildung and freedom - the modern university]. In Pedagogikkens mange ansikter: pedagogikkens idéhistorie fra antikken til det postmoderne [The many faces of education: The educational history of ideas from antiquity to postmodernity] (pp. 199–2014). Universitetsforlaget.

Fossum, H. (2015a). Towards an ontological turn in music education with Heidegger’s philosophy of being and his notion of releasement. F. Pio & Ø. Varkøy (Eds.), Philosophy of music education challenged: Heideggerian inspirations, (p. 75–97). Springer.

Fossum, H. (2015b). Flerstemmig og mangespektret musikkundervisning [Many-voiced and multi-spectered music education]. In H. Christensen & I. Ulleberg (Eds.), Samtalens didaktiske muligheter [The didactical possibilities of dialogue], (pp. 183–200). Gyldendal Akademisk.

Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin.

Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. China Lectures. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd ed.). Continuum International Publishing Group.

Hägg, H. F., & Kristiansen, A. (Eds.) (2012). Attending to silence. Portal Academic.

Hansen, F. T. (2009). At stå i det åbne. Dannelse gennem filosofisk undren og nærvær [Staying in openness. Bildung through philosophical wondering and presence] (2nd ed.). Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Hansen, F. T. (2010). The phenomenology of wonder in higher education. In M. Brinckmann (Ed.), Erziehung. Phänomenologische perspektiven. Königshausen & Neumann.

Hansen, F. T. (2011). Nyttig som en rose [Useful as a rose]. In B. Hagtvedt & G. Ognjenovic (Eds.), Dannelse. Tenkning, modning, refleksjon. Nordiske perspektiver på allmenndannelsens nødvendighet i høyere utdanning og forskning [Bildung. Thinking, maturation, reflection. Nordic perspectives on the necessity of Bildung in higher education and research]. Dreyers Forlag.

Kant, I. (1784/1983). An answer to the question: What is enlightenment? In T. Humphrey (Trans.), Immanuel Kant: Perpetual peace and other essays. Hackett Publishing.

Kazemi, E., & Hintz, A. (2014). Intentional talk. How to structure and lead productive mathematical discussions. Stenhouse Publishers.

Keil, C. (2000). Musicking: The meanings of performing and listening by Christopher Small. Review. Ethnomusicology, 44(1), 161–163. University of Illinois Press on behalf of Society for Ethnomusicology.

Klafki, W. (2000). The significance of classical theories of Bildung for a contemporary concept of allgemeinbildung. In I. Westbury, K. Riquarts, & S. T. Hopmann (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German didaktik tradition (pp. 85–107). L. Erlbaum Associates.

Klafki, W. (2001a). Grundtræk af et nyt almendannelseskoncept. I centrum: Tidstypiske nøgleproblemer [Basic characteristics of a new concept for general education. Basic problems typical of the period]. In Dannelsesteori og didaktik – nyere studier. [Theory of Bildung and didactics – Recent studies]. Forlaget Klim.

Klafki, W. (2001b). Dannelsesteori og didaktik - nye studier [Bildung – theory and didactics. New studies]. Forlaget Klim.

Klafki, W. (2001c). Kategorial dannelse. Bidrag til en dannelsesteoretisk fortolkning av moderne didaktikk. [Categorical Bildung. Contributions to a Bildung-theoretical interpretation of modern didactics]. In E. L. Dale (Ed.), Om utdanning – klassiske tekster [About education – Classical texts] (pp. 167–204). Gyldendal.

Knudsen, J. S., Skånland, M. S., & Trondalen, G. (2014). Musikk etter 22. juli. Norges musikkhøgskole.

Koller, H.-C. (2011). Bildung anders denken. Einführung in die Theorie transformatorischer Bildungsprozesse [Understanding Bildung differently: Introduction to a theory of transformative processes of Bildung]. Kohlhammer.

Koskela, J., & Siljander, P. (2014). What is existential educational encounter? Paideusis, 21(2), 71–80.

Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63.

Linell, P. (2003). Dialogical tensions: On Rommetveitian themes of minds, meanings, monologues, and languages. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10(3), 219–229. DOI: 10.1207/s15327884mca1003_4.

Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Information Age Publishing.

Linell, P. (2017). Dialogue, dialogicality and interactivity: A conceptually bewildering field? Language & Dialogue, 7(3), 301–336.

Mason, J. (2000). Asking mathematical questions mathematically. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(1), 97–111.

Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(1), 25–45.

Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. Nova Science Publishers.

Matusov. E. (2005). Ontologically oriented teaching [Conference presentation]. 1st International Congress of the ISCAR, Sevilla, Spain, 22–24 September 2005.

McEwan, H. (1995). Narrative understanding in the study of teaching. In H. McEwan & K. Egan (Eds.), Narrative in teaching, learning, and research (pp. 166–183). Teachers College Press.

Mercer, N., & Hodgkinson, S. (Eds.) (2008). Exploring talk in school: Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes. Sage Publications.

Michelet, S. (2020). Klassen som fellesskap. Elevkultur - faglig og sosial læring (bind 1) [The school class as a community. Pupil culture - subject-specific and social learning]. Cappelen Damm Akademisk Forlag.

Nielsen, F. V. (1998). Almen musikdidaktik [General music didactics]. Akademisk Forlag.

Nielsen, F. V. (2006). On the relation between music and man: Is there a common basis, or is it altogether individually and socially constructed? In B. Stålhammar (Ed.), Music and human beings: Music and identity (pp. 163–182). Universitetsbiblioteket

Nordenbo, S. E., Søgaard Larsen, M., Tiftikiçi, N., Wendt, R. E., & Østergaard, S. (2008). Teacher competences and pupil learning in pre-school and school – A systematic review carried out for the Ministry of Education and Research, Oslo. In Evidence base. Danish Clearinghouse for Educational Research, School of Education, University of Aarhus.

Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 261–290.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Study on social and emotional skills. https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/social-emotional-skills-study/about/

Pio, F. (2007). Om det uhørte [On the unheard]. In F. V. Nielsen et al. (Eds.), Nordic research in music education yearbook, 9(2007), 121–152.

Pio, F., & Varkøy, F. (2012). A reflection on musical experience as existential experience: An ontological turn. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 20(2), 99–116. Indiana University Press.

Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 5–23. doi: 10.1080/0951839950080103.

Rangnes, T. E., & Herheim, R. (2019). Lærers tilrettelegging for argument og agens. [The teacher’s facilitating for arguing and agency]. In Demokratisk danning i skolen [Democratic education in school] (pp. 168–186). Universitetsforlaget.

Riesbeck, E. (2008). På tal om matematik: matematiken, vardagen och den matematikdidaktiska diskursen [Speaking about mathematics: Mathematics, everyday life, and the mathematic-didactical discourse] [Doctoral dissertation]. Linköping Studies in Behavioural Science, 129. Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning. Studentlitteratur.

Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage Publications.

Rinholm, H. (2020). Musikalsk-estetisk erfaring som tilsynekomsthendelse [Musical-aesthetic experience as event of appearing]. Ø. Varkøy & H. Holm (Eds.), Musikkfilosofiske tekster. Tanker om musikk – og språk, tolkning, erfaring, tid, klang, stillhet m.m. [Texts on Philosophy of Music. Thoughts on music–and language, interpretation, experience, time, sound, silence etc.], pp. 41–60. Cappelen Damm Akademisk. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.115.ch3

Rinholm, H., & Varkøy, Ø. (2020). Music education for the common good? Between hubris and resignation: A call for temperance. In I. M. Yob & E. R. Jorgensen (Eds.). Humane music education for the common good (pp. 40–53). Indiana University Press.

Rommetveit, R. (2008). Språk, individuell psyke og kulturelt kollektiv. Gyldendal Akademisk.

Roth, A. S. (2004). Shared agency and contralateral commitments. The Philosophical Review, 113(3), 359–410.

Small, C. (1998). Musicking: The meanings of performing and listening. Wesleyan University Press.

Solem, I. H., & Reikerås, E. (2017). Det matematiske barnet (2nd ed). [The mathematical child (2nd ed.)]. Caspar Forlag.

Trevarthen, C. (1992). An infant’s motives for speaking and thinking in the culture. In A. H. Wold (Ed.), The dialogical alternative: Towards a theory of language and mind (pp. 99–137). Scandinavian University Press.

Trevarthen, C. (2008). The musical art of infant conversation: Narrating in the time of sympathetic experience, without rational interpretation, before words. Musicae Scientiae, 12(1suppl), 15–46.

Ulleberg, I., & Christensen, H. (2020). En triadisk modell for klasseledelse. [A triadic model of classroom management]. In H. Christensen & I. Ulleberg (Eds.), Klasseledelse, fag og danning, (2nd ed.). Gyldendal Akademisk.

Ulleberg, I., & Solem, I. H. (2015). Hvordan kan lærere bidra til deltakelse og matematisering i klassesamtalen i matematikk? [How can teachers contribute to participation and mathematising in the classroom talk in mathematics?]. In H. Christensen & R. S. Stokke (Eds.), Samtalens didaktiske muligheter [Didactic possibilities in conversations] (pp. 104–120). Gyldendal Akademisk.

Ulleberg, I., & Solem, I. H. (2018). Which questions should be asked in classroom talk in mathematics? Presentation and discussion of a questioning model. Acta Didactica Norge, 12(1), Art. 3, 21, sider. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.5607

United Nations Educational, Social and Cultural Organization. (2015). Rethinking education. Towards a global common good? https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232555

von Humboldt, W. (2000). Theory of Bildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (G. Horton-Krüger, Trans.) (pp. 57–61). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

von Wright, M. (2007). Where am I when I am at ease? Relocating the notion of activity in education. Nordisk pedagogik, 27(3), 222–235.

Wegerif, R., & Phillipson, N. (2016). Dialogic education: Mastering core concepts through thinking together. Routledge.

Wells, G. (1996). Using the tool-kit of discourse in the activity of learning and teaching. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(2), 74–101.