The dialogic nature of regulation in collaborative digital argumentative writing practices

Main Article Content

Zuany Luz Paba Argote
Diana De Castro Daza
Nancy Ramírez Roncancio

Abstract

This article discusses the dialogic nature of regulating perspectives on a controversial topic during students’ argumentative writing in remote teaching. The emerging collaborative writing processes mediated by digital technology are importantly changed as responses to physical distancing in education, as demanded by the measures of biosecurity established by the national government to prevent the transmission of COVID-19. Our analysis is framed in a sociocultural perspective, which contributes to our understanding of the concepts related to dialogism, regulation, positionings on a topic, collaborative writing, and digital technology as a tool for dialogic interaction. Our qualitative, idiographic study analyzes the argumentative utterances produced by a dyad of students enrolled in a Textual Production course at a Colombian public university who write a critical commentary over four (4) weeks using Google Docs application. The findings indicate that the participants discuss and negotiate decisions in the group writing situation and that during this dialogic interaction, the ideas are influenced by the thoughts of the other. When they communicate with each other, their discourses regulate their positionings on the social situation that is the subject of the dialogue. It is also possible to identify both the possibilities of the pedagogical mode and its potential limitations for dialogic interaction, which synchronously and asynchronously facilitate or restrict the performance of the joint writing activity. It can be concluded that within the framework of remote teaching, digital technology has become a flexible mode of pedagogical practice that supports dialogic interaction, enables regulation among peers for discussion, negotiation, and positioning on a topic, and facilitates the construction of collective knowledge that emerges in argumentative collaborative writing.

Article Details

How to Cite
Paba Argote, Z. L., De Castro Daza, D. ., & Ramírez Roncancio, N. (2022). The dialogic nature of regulation in collaborative digital argumentative writing practices. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 10, DT1-DT21. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2022.468
Section
Special Issue: Digital technologies supporting dialogical education
Author Biographies

Zuany Luz Paba Argote, Universidad del Valle-Universidad del Magdalena

Zuany Luz Paba Argote is a PhD candidate in Psychology at the University of Valle (Universidad del Valle) and an Adjunct Full Time Professor at the University of Magdalena (Universidad del Magdalena); with a Master of Education from the Caribbean State University System (Sistema de Universidades Estatales del Caribe - SUE Caribe); and a Specialization in Edumatics from the Autonomous University of Colombia (Fundación Universidad Autónoma de Colombia). She is interested in studies on Dialogism and the use of technologies in teaching and learning processes. She has research experience in reading and writing processes in university students, pedagogy and didactics in language teaching, academic performance and pro-social skills in children and young people. 

Diana De Castro Daza, Universidad del Valle

Diana De Castro Daza is a professor at the Institute of Psychology and director of the Language, Cognition and Education Research Group at the Center for Research in Psychology, Cognition and Culture (Centro de Investigaciones en Psicología, Cognición y Cultura), University of Valle (Universidad del Valle), Cali, Colombia. She obtained a PhD in Psychology with an emphasis in Human Development Processes and Health from the University of Brasilia (Universidade de Brasília), Brazil. She is a psychologist and received a Master of Psychology with an emphasis in the Psychology of Cognitive Development from University of Valle (Universidad del Valle). Her research, teaching experience and publications are focused on the areas of education and development, in particular the study of textual production, peer interaction, narration and mediation of digital technologies.

Nancy Ramírez Roncancio, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia

Nancy Ramírez Roncancio, Professor at the Pedagogical and Technological University of Colombia (Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica De Colombia), with professional experience in both classroom and distance programs. She received a degree in Psychology from the UPTC, and a PhD and master’s degree in Cognitive Psychology from the Federal University of Pernambuco (Universidade Federal De Pernambuco), Brazil. She obtained a Specialization in Learning Needs in Reading, Writing and Mathematics from the Pedagogical and Technological University of Colombia (Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica De Colombia). She is an active member of the Human Development, Cognition and Education Research Group and an Associate Researcher at the Center for Research in Argumentation at the Federal University of Pernambuco (Universidade Federal De Pernambuco). Research areas: educational psychology with an emphasis on the reading and comprehension of texts, cognitive development with an emphasis on argumentation and the development of critical-reflective thinking (metacognition).

References

Aiolfi, G., Lima, A., & Gritti, L. L. (2020). Dialogic functions of repair by lexical synonymy in the process of writing and rewriting of an opinion article. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 8, A20-A41. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2020.235
Bakhtin, M. M. (1989). Las formas del tiempo y del cronotopo en la novela [The forms of time and chronotope in the novel] (H. S. Kriúkova & V. C. Cremallé, Trans.). In M. M. Bajtín (Ed.), Teoría y estética de la novela (pp. 237-409). Editorial Taurus. (Original work published in 1975).
Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Problemas de la creatividad de Dostoievski [Dostoevsky's Problems of Creativity] (T. Bubnova, Trans.). Fondo de Cultura Económica. (Original work published in 1929).
Borges da Silva, C. (2019). Dialogical Thematic Analysis of Conversation in Tutors Forums Online. In A. Costa, L. Reis & A. Moreira (Eds.), Computer Supported Qualitative Research. WCQR 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 861., pp. 248–254). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01406-3_21
Brandão, H. (1997). Escrita, leitura, dialogicidade [Writing, reading, dialogicity]. In B. Brair (Ed.), Bakthin, dialogismo e construcao do sentido (pp. 281-290). Editorial Unicamp.
Burns, R. (2020). A COVID-19 panacea in digital technologies? Challenges for democracy and higher education. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(2), 246-249. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2043820620930832
Cabero, J., & Valencia, R. (2021). Y el COVID-19 transformó al sistema educativo: reflexiones y experiencias por aprender [And COVID-19 transformed the educational system: reflections and experiences to learn]. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation (IJERI), 15,218-228. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.5246
Caron, J. (1983). Les régulations du discours: psycholinguistique et pragmatique du language [Las regulaciones del habla: psicolingüística y pragmática del lenguaje]. Presses Universitaires de France.
Castilho, A.T., & Castilho, C.M. (2002). Advérbios Modalizadores [Modifying Adverbs]. In R, Ilari (Ed.), Gramática do Português Falado (2nd ed., pp. 199-247). Editorial Unicamp.
Chabrol, C. (1994). Discours du travail social et pragmatique [Discourse of social and pragmatic work]. Presses Universitaires de France.
Cueva Gaibor, D. A. (2020). La tecnología educativa en tiempos de crisis [Educational technology in times of crisis]. Revista Conrado, 16(74), 341-348. https://conrado.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/conrado/article/view/1370
De Chiaro, S. (2006). Argumentacao en sala de aula;um camino para o desenvolvimento da auto-regulacao do pensamento [Argumentation in the Classroom; A Path to the Development of Self-Regulation of Thought] [Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco]. ATTENA - Repositório Digital da UFPE. https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/8389
Ferrada, D. (2020). Dialogic pedagogy linking worlds: participatory community classrooms., Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 28:1, 131-146, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/14681366.2019.1615534
Goulart, C. (2007). Enunciar é argumentar: analisando um episódio de uma aula de História com base em Bakhtin [Enunciating is arguing: analyzing an episode from a history class based on Bakhtin]. Pro-Posições, 18(3), Article 54. https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/article/view/8643530
Huang, C. W., & Archer, A. (2017). Training writing centre tutors for argument in a digital age. In S. Clarence & L. Dison (Eds.), Writing centres in higher education: Working in and across the disciplines (pp. 81-96). Sun Media.
Hynes, G. (2014). Bakhtinian Dialogism. In D. Coghlan y M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research (pp. 73-75). SAGE Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446294406.n37
Kolikant, Y. B. D., & Pollack, S. (2019). Collaborative, Multi-perspective Historical Writing: The Explanatory Power of a Dialogical Framework. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 7, A89-A100. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2019.245
Leitão, S. (2001). Analyzing changes in view during argumentation: A quest for method. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(3), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.3.907
Leitão, S. (2007a). Argumentacao e desenvolvimento do pensamento reflexivo [Argumentation and development of reflective thinking]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 20(3), 454-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722007000300013
Leitão, S. (2007b). La dimensión epistémica de la argumentación [The epistemic dimension of argumentation]. In E. Kronmüller y C. Cornejo (Eds.), Ciencias de la mente: aproximaciones desde Latinoamérica (pp. 5-32). JCSáez Editor.
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interactions, and contexts in dialogical perspectives. John Benjamins North America.
Ludvigsen, K., Ness, I. J., & Timmis, S. (2019). Writing on the wall: How the use of technology can open dialogical spaces in lectures. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 34, Article 100559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.02.007
Martínez, M.C. (2013). El procesamiento multinivel del texto escrito: ¿un giro discursivo en los estudios sobre la comprensión de textos? [Multilevel processing of written text: a discursive turn in studies on text comprehension?]. Enunciación, 18(2), 124-139. https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/enunc/article/view/7488/14112
Matusov, E. (2009). Guest Editor's Introduction to Parts I and II: The School of the Dialogue of Cultures Pedagogical Movement in Ukraine and Russia [Introducción del editor invitado a las partes I y II: El movimiento pedagógico de la Escuela del Diálogo de las Culturas en Ucrania y Rusia]. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405470100
Monea, B. (2020). Looking At Screens: Examining Human-Computer Interaction and Communicative Breakdown in an Educational Online Writing Community. Computers and Composition, 58, Article 102605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102605
Moreno Mosquera, L.G. (2014, September 15). La corrupción no es la única causa de la pobreza del Chocó [Corruption is not the only cause of poverty in Chocó]. Color de Colombia (El Tiempo Blogs). https://blogs.eltiempo.com/afrocolombianidad/2014/09/15/la-corrupcion-no-es-la-unica-causa-de-la-pobreza-del-choco/
Mosquera, J.E. (2015, July 31). ¿Por qué el Chocó es pobre? Una muestra de que Antioquia y el Cauca subdesarrollaron al Chocó [Why is Chocó poor? A sample that Antioquia and Cauca underdeveloped Chocó]. Las 2 Orillas. https://www.las2orillas.co/por-que-el-choco-es-pobre/#:~:text=Las%20luchas%20por%20el%20control,el%20Cauca%20subdesarrollaron%20al%20Choc%C3%B3.
Nykopp, M., Marttunen, M., & Erkens, G. (2019). Coordinating collaborative writing in an online environment. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(3), 536-556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9203-3
O’Brien, B. C., & Battista, A. (2020). Situated learning theory in health professions education research: a scoping review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 25(2), 483-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09900-w
Ramírez, N. (2018). Efeito do debate crítico na redução da polarização do discurso argumentativo em sala de aula [Effect of critical debate in reducing the polarization of argumentative discourse in the classroom] [Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco]. ATTENA - Repositório Digital da UFPE https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/32405
Ramírez, N., Souza, D., & Leitao, S. (2013). Desarrollo de habilidades argumentativas en la enseñanza-aprendizaje de contenidos curriculares [Development of argumentative skills in the teaching-learning of curricular contents]. Cogency, 5(1), 107-133. http://cogency.udp.cl/index.php/cogency/article/view/152
Roselli, N. (2016). El aprendizaje colaborativo: Bases teóricas y estrategias aplicables en la enseñanza universitaria [Collaborative learning: Theoretical bases and applicable strategies in university teaching]. Propósitos y Representaciones, 4(1), 219-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2016.v4n1.90
Ruiz, L., & Leitão, S. (2010). Regulación argumentativa, revisión local y géneros discursivos escritos [Argumentative regulation, local revision and written discourse genres]. Praxis: revista de psicología, (18), 149-171. http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/900
Saneleuterio, E., & Gómez-Devís, M. B. (2020). Escritura colaborativa en línea. Un estudio de la revisión textual compartida en la formación inicial de maestros [Collaborative online writing. A study of shared textual revision in initial teacher training]. Tendencias pedagógicas, (36), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.15366/tp2020.36.05
Santa-Clara, A. O. & Leitão, S. (2011). Escrita como fórum dialógico-argumentativo de constituição do conhecimento [Writing as a dialogic-argumentative forum for the constitution of knowledge]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 24(2), 394-402. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722011000200021
Santa-Clara, A.M.O. (2005). A constituição dialógico-argumentativa do conhecimento no processo de produção do texto escrito [The dialogic-argumentative constitution of knowledge in the written text production process] [Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco]. ATTENA - Repositório Digital da UFPE. https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/8310
Severina, E., & Milkevich, E. (2019). Digital text in the space of modern culture. SHS Web of Conferences, 72, Article 03036. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20197203036
Teo, T. (2019). Students and Teachers’ Intention to Use Technology: Assessing Their Measurement Equivalence and Structural Invariance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(1), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117749430
Vladdo. (2016). Vladdomania: ¿Y todavia nos preguntamos a qué se debe el descontento en el Chocó? [Vladdomania: And we still wonder what is the reason for the discontent in Chocó?] [Cartoon]. Revista Semana. https://pruebas.semana.com/caricaturas/articulo/vladdomania-edicion-1790/489602
Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001
Zapata, A. U., Salazar, D. A. R., & Álvarez, O. H. (2017). Exploración de un ejercicio de escritura colaborativa en línea de un grupo de estudiantes de básica primaria [Exploring an online collaborative writing exercise for a group of elementary school students]. Revista Lasallista de Investigación, 14(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v14n1a2