Main Article Content
This paper reenvisions academic language learning in the university from a dialogic authorial perspective inspired by the work of Bakhtin. I argue that language pedagogues have misappropriated the radical alternative Bakhtin poses for language learning in his critique of genre through adopting a Vygotskyian internalization approach to discourse and a post-structuralist interpretation of Bakhtinian dialogic discourse as intertextuality. I explore how genre pedagogy has adopted these misunderstandings of Bakhtin to prioritize students’ and scholars’ socialization within pre-existing, commonly accepted, shared, authoritative patterns of discourse. I claim that genre pedagogy tends to legitimize the practice of university writing curricula to postpone students’ engagement in meaning making, focusing on training over education. I explore the consequence of this prioritization on socialization and training in form for suppressing students’ dialogic addressivity to and problematization of the ideas of others, which is an essential for meaningful academic discourse. By contrast, a dialogic authorial approach to language learning prioritizes education through students’ and scholars’ ontological engagement in posing problems and authoring meaning in communion with others. The expectation is for language forms to become a necessary byproduct of the production of utterances that are meaningful to oneself and responsive to others. When focused on meaning, academic language forms become invisible except when there are challenges with intelligibility or modality. I argue for a radical rethinking of university language learning curricula in terms of a focus on voice and the “stylistics” of form to serve meaning making.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
Abdelal, R. (2008). The rules of globalization: Case book. Harvard Business School. Retrieved from https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=24466.
Alda, A. (2012). Editorial: The flame challenge. Science, 335(6072), 1019. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41508129
Allen, G. (2000). Intertextuality. London: Taylor & Francis.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1999). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics (Vol. 8). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (2004). Dialogic origin and dialogic pedagogy of grammar: Stylistics in teaching Russian language in secondary school. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42(6), 12-49. doi:10.1080/10610405.2004.11059233
Ball, A. F., & Freedman, S. W. (2004). Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bateson, G. (1987). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
Bazerman, C. (1985). Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication, 2(1), 3-23. doi:10.1177/0741088385002001001
Bazerman, C. (1992). From cultural criticism to disciplinary participation: Living with powerful words. In A. Herrington & C. Moran (Eds.), Writing, teaching, and learning the disciplines (pp. 61-68). New York: Modern Language Association of America.
Bazerman, C. (1997). The life of genre, the life in the classroom. In W. Bishop & H. Ostrum (Eds.), Genre and Writing (pp. 19-26). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
Bazerman, C. (2001). Distanced and refined selves: Educational tensions in writing with the power of knowledge. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Academic Writing in Contexts: Implications and Applications (1 ed., pp. 23-29). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Bazerman, C. (2004). Intertextualities: Volosinov, Bakhtin, literary theory, and literacy studies. In A. F. Ball & S. W. Freedman (Eds.), Bakhtinian Perspectives on Language, Literacy, and Learning (pp. xi, 349 p.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bazerman, C. (2009). Genre and cognitive development: Beyond writing to learn. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a Changing World (pp. 279-294). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse: Parlor Press.
Beach, K. D. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 24, 101-139.
Bibler, V. S. (2009). The foundations of the School of the Dialogue of Cultures program. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(1), 34-60. doi:10.2753/RPO1061-0405470102
Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Devitt, A. (2009). Teaching critical genre awareness. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a Changing World (pp. 337-351). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
Di Pietro, R. J. (1987). Strategic interaction: Learning languages through scenarios. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duff, D. (2002). Intertextuality versus genre theory: Bakhtin, Kristeva and the question of genre. Paragraph, 25(1), 54-73. doi:10.3366/jsp.2002.25.1.54
Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Guetti, J. (2004). Monologic and dialogic: Wittgenstein, Heart of Darkness, and linguistic skepticism. In J. Gibson & W. Huemer (Eds.), The Literary Wittgenstein (pp. 251-266). London: Routledge.
Howard, T. C. (2002). "Stripping them at the core:" The emasculation of Black boys in U.S. schools. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Hutchins, E. (2006). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kennedy, M. M. (2005). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. New York: Columbia University Press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Leki, I. (2017). Undergraduates in a second language: Challenges and complexities of academic literacy development. London: Routledge.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp.
Lesic-Thomas, A. (2005). Behind Bakhtin: Russian formalism and Kristeva's intertextuality. Paragraph, 28(3), 1-20. doi:10.3366/para.2005.28.3.1
Li, Y. (2012). “I have no time to find out where the sentences came from; I just rebuild them”: A biochemistry professor eliminating novices’ textual borrowing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 59-70. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.01.001
Lobok, A. (2011). The probabilistic world: The chronicles of the philosophical pedagogical reflections of an educational experiment. Yekaterinburg, Russia.
Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. De Bot, R.B. Ginsburg & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.
Matusov, E. (2004). Guest editor's Introduction: Bakhtin's dialogic pedagogy. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42(6), 3-11. doi:10.1080/10610405.2004.11059237
Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Matusov, E. (2011a). Authorial teaching and learning. In E. J. White & P. Michael (Eds.), Bakhtinian Pedagogy: Opportunities and Challenges for Research, Policy and Practice in Education Across the Globe (pp. 21-46). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Matusov, E. (2011b). Irreconcilable differences in Vygotsky’s and Bakhtin’s approaches to the social and the individual: An educational perspective. Culture & Psychology, 17(1), 99-119. doi:10.1177/1354067X10388840
Matusov, E. (2015). Comprehension: A dialogic authorial approach. Culture & Psychology, 21(3), 392-416. doi:10.1177/1354067X15601197
Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2012). Diverse approaches to education: Alienated learning, closed and open participatory socialization, and critical dialogue. Human Development, 55(3), 159-166.
Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2017). Promoting students’ ownership of their own education through critical dialogue and democratic self-governance. Dialogic Pedagogy, 5(March). doi:10.5195/dpj.2017.199
Matusov, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A., & Gradovski, M. (2019). Dialogic pedagogy and polyphonic research art: Bakhtin by and for educators. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Matusov, E., Smith, M., Soslau, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A., & von Duyke, K. (2016). Dialogic education for and from authorial agency. Dialogic Pedagogy, 4. doi:10.5195/dpj.2016.172
Matusov, E., & Smith, M. P. (2007). Teaching imaginary children: University students’ narratives about their Latino practicum children. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 705-729. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.012
Matusov, E., & von Duyke, K. (2010). Bakhtin’s notion of the Internally Persuasive Discourse in education: Internal to what? (A case of discussion of issues of foul language in teacher education). In K. Junefelt & P. Nordin (Eds.), Proceedings from the Second International Interdisciplinary Conference on perspectives and limits of dialogism in Mikhail Bakhtin Stockholm University, Sweden June 3-5, 2009 (pp. 174-199). Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Mapping concepts of agency in educational contexts. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 420-446. doi:10.1007/s12124-015-9336-0
Mitra, S. (2006). The hole in the wall: Self-organising systems in education. New Delhi: Tata-McGraw-Hill Pub. Co. Ltd.
Mitra, S. (2010). The child-driven education. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/sugata_mitra_the_child_driven_education
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132-141.
Morson, G. S., & Emerson, C. (1990). Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a prosaics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Motta-Roth, D. (2009). The role of context in academic text production and writing pedagogy. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a Changing World (pp. 317-336). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse: Parlor Press,.
Oxford English Dictionary. (2007). "proper, adj., n., and adv." (3rd ed.): Oxford University Press.
Russell, D. R., Lea, M., Parker, J., Street, B., & Donahue, T. (2009). Exploring notions of genre in “academic literacies" and “writing across the curriculum": Approaches across countries and contexts. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a Changing World (pp. 459-491). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse; Palmer Press.
Sidorkin, A. M. (2002). Learning relations: Impure education, deschooled schools, & dialogue with evil. New York: P. Lang.
Smith, M. P. (2019). Bullying and interpersonal conflict from a "dialogic event" perspective. Dialogic Pedagogy, 7, A101-A142. doi:10.5195/dpj.2019.259
Smith, M. P. (2022, in preparation). Dialogic problematization of academic integrity education. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3rd ed.). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Todorov, T. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin: The dialogical principle. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
van Oers, B. (2012). Meaningful cultural learning by imitative participation: The case of abstract thinking in primary school. Human Development, 55(3), 136-158. doi:10.1159/000339293
Vygotsky, L. S. (1984). Problema vozrasta. In L. S. Vygotskij (Ed.), Sobranie so?inenij (Vol. 4, pp. 244–268). Moscow: Pedagogika.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A Sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Press.
Zhao, Y. (2009). Catching up or leading the way: American education in the age of globalization. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.