Main Article Content
This paper analyses meaning-making processes in a blended setting—face-to-face interaction and web forum—purposely created for collaborative learning activity. The analysis focuses on one pair out of 14 dyads. The dyad comprises two female students aged 17 and 18 who attended a Brazilian third-year state secondary school. We envisioned intertextuality in a seamless thematic flux using a single theme—about everyday problems in the culture—by two different problem-solving tasks. Task#1 required discussing two polemic reports published in an online newspaper: one in favour of using digital technologies in class, the other against it. Task#2 involved perspective-taking, where students should imagine the school in 20 years. Afterwards, the pair participated in an episodic interview focusing on their participation in both tasks. The interactions were video recorded. To map the meaning-making processes, we applied the dialogic thematic analysis looking for centripetal and centrifugal forces. A semantic map was drawn and discussed. Altogether, the paired and grouped collaborative activities in blended learning promoted authorial production. Our dyad achieved reflective meta-analysis when they compared their viewpoints with the perspective of their colleagues by using justifications and explanations grounded in their production, generating reflexivity and agency in dialogue.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas.
Barbato, S. & Beraldo, R. (2020). Polemic forum in Blended Learning as new strategies for a borderless higher education. In Gesú, M. G. di, and González, M. F. Cultural views on online learning in Higher Education: a seemingly borderless class, Springer Series, 1, 87-101.
Beraldo, R., Ligorio, M. B., & Barbato, S. (2017). Intersubjectivity in primary and second education: a review study. Research Papers in Education, 33, 278-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1302497.
Beraldo, R., Annese, S., Schwartz, N., & Ligorio, M. B. (2021). Building intersubjectivity in blended problem-solving tasks. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction 32(6), 100546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100545
Evans, M. A., E. Feenstra, R. Ryon, & McNeill, D. (2011). A multimodal approach to coding discourse: collaboration, distributed cognition, and geometric reasoning. International Journal Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 6(2), 253-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-0113-0
Gilje, Ø. (2019). Expanding educational chronotopes with personal digital devices. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.03.002
Kayalar, F. (2022). Characteristics of ubiquitous model and investigation of its applicability in language education. Proceedings of IAC 2022 in Vienna, Prague. August 6-6.
Lévi, P. (1999). Cibercultura. (Translated for Carlos Irineu da Costa). São Paulo: Editora 34. 272 p.
Ligorio, M. B., Talamo, A., & Pontecorvo, C. (2005). Building intersubjectivity at a distance during the collaborative writing of fairy tales. Computers & Education, 45(3), 357-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.013
Ligorio, M. B., Cesareni, D., & Schwartz, N. (2008). Collaborative virtual environments as means to increase the level of intersubjectivity in a distributed cognition system. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(3), 339-357.
Ligorio, M. B., Amenduni, F., Sansone, N., & McLay, K. (2020). Designing blended university courses for transaction from academic learning to professional competences. In Gesú, M. G. di, and González, M. F. Cultural views on online learning in Higher Education: a seemingly borderless class, Springer Series, 67-86.
Ligorio M. B. (2021). Time to blend: why and how education should adopt the blended approach. In TeleXbe, The First Workshop on Technology Enhanced Learning Environments for Blended Education, Foggia, Italy.
Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture, and Activity 3, 25-45. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0301_4
Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
Matusov, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2017). Promoting student’s ownership of their own education trough critical dialogue and democratic self-governance. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 5, E1-E29. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2017.199
Matusov, E. (2020). Pattern-recognition, intersubjectivity, and dialogic meaning-making in education. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 8, E1-E24. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2020.314
Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2011). You are nobody! The three chronotopes of play. Bakhtinian pedagogy: Opportunities and challenges for research, policy and practice in education across the globe. (p. 201-2022). New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organisation in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
Perrino, S. (2020). Chronotope. The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093
Lévi, P. (1999). Cibercultura. (Translated by Carlos Irineu da Costa). São Paulo: Editora 34.
Pifarré, M., & Staarman, J. K. (2011). Wiki-supported collaborative learning in primary education: How a dialogic space is created for thinking together. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 187-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9116-x
Ritella, G. & Hakkarainen, K. (2012). Instrumental genesis in technology-mediated learning: From double stimulation to expansive knowledge practices. Computer Supported Learning 7, 239-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9144-1
Ritella, G., Rajala, A., & Renshaw, P. (2021). Using chronotope to research the space-time relations of learning and education: Dimensions of the unit of analysis. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 31, Part B, 100381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100381.
Singh, H. (2021). Building effective blended learning programs. In Challenges and Opportunities for the Global Implementation of E-Learning Frameworks (pp. 15-23). IGI Global.
Sidorkin, A. M. (1996). An ontological understanding of dialogue in Education. (Doctor of Philosophy) 122f. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Toward an Analysis of Discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stahl, G. (2006). Sustaining group cognition in math chat environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2, 1-16.
Trausan-Matu, S., Stahl, G., & Sarmiento, J. W. (2008). Supporting polyphonic collaborative learning. e-Service Journal, 58-74. https://doi.org/10.2979/ESJ.2007.6.1.59
Turkle, S. (1984). The Second Self: computer and the human spirit. Cambridge: MIT Press.