Discussion Formats for Addressing Emotions: Implications for Social-Emotional Learning

Main Article Content

Eran Hakim
Adam Lefstein
Hadar Netz

Abstract

Scholars of Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) advocate discussion as a promising instructional method yet rarely specify how such discussions should be conducted. Facilitating classroom discussions is highly challenging, particularly about emotions. Furthermore, the SEL literature contains contradictory discursive imperatives; it typically overlooks the gaps between students’ and teachers’ emotional codes and how these codes are shaped by culture, class, and gender. The current study explores different ways in which teachers facilitate classroom dialogue about emotions. We analyze data drawn from a two-year ethnographic study conducted as part of a design-based implementation research project aimed at fostering productive dialogue in primary language arts classrooms, looking in particular at two lessons centered around a story about crying. We found two different interactional genres for discussions about emotions: (1) inclusive emotional dialogue, in which students share emotions experienced in their everyday lives; (2) emotional inquiry, in which students explore emotions, their expressions, and their social meanings. Both types of discussion generated informative exchanges about students’ emotions. Yet the discussions also put the teacher and students in challenging positions, often related to the need to navigate between contradictory discursive norms and emotional codes.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hakim, E., Lefstein, A., & Netz, H. (2024). Discussion Formats for Addressing Emotions: Implications for Social-Emotional Learning. Dialogic Pedagogy: A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education, 12(1), A16-A38. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2024.558
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Eran Hakim, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Israel

Eran Hakim is an anthropologist of education whose research focuses on the social and emotional lives of children in schools with a particular emphasis on school bullying and the overall wellbeing of children within educational settings.

Adam Lefstein, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel

Adam Lefstein is the Morton L. Mandel Director of the Seymour Fox School of Education at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. His research and teaching focus on pedagogy, classroom interaction, teacher learning, and educational change. He is particularly interested in the intersection between research and professional practice and how to conduct research that is meaningful, rigorous, and helpful for educators.

Hadar Netz, Tel Aviv University, Israel

Hadar Netz is a senior lecturer in the Program for Multilingual Education at the School of Education, Tel-Aviv University, Israel. She is a discourse analyst conducting research across diverse educational contexts and genres. Her areas of expertise encompass classroom interactions, children’s literature, and the dynamics of digital communication within social media platforms. (ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9315-5911).

References

Alexander, R. (2008). Essays on pedagogy. Routledge.

Alexander, R. (2020). A dialogic teaching companion. Routledge.

Anwaruddin, S. M. (2016). Why critical literacy should turn to ‘the affective turn’: Making a case for critical affective literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3), 381-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1042429

Ariel, S. Z., & Katriel, T. (1977). Range-indicators in colloquial Israeli Hebrew: A semantic-syntactic analysis. Hebrew Annual Review, 1, 29.

Assor, A. (2020). A different angle on social-emotional learning: A developmental-motivational approach to SEL. In R. Benbenishty & T. Friedman (Eds.), Cultivating SEL in the Israeli education system – summary of expert committee recommendations. Center for Knowledge and Research in Education, The Israeli Academy of Sciences and Humanities.

Asterhan, C. S. C. (2013). Epistemic and interpersonal dimensions of peer argumentation: Conceptualization and quantitative assessment. In M. J. Baker, J. Andriessen, & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning (pp. 251-271). Routledge.

Asterhan, C. S., Howe, C., Lefstein, A., Matusov, E., & Reznitskaya, A. (2020). Controversies and consensus in research on dialogic teaching and learning. Dialogic Pedagogy, 8.

Barak, M., & Lefstein, A. (2022). Opening texts for discussion: Developing dialogic reading stances. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(2), 449-468.

Burawoy, M. (1998). The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 4-33. doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00040

Burbules, N. C. (1993). Dialogue in teaching: Theory and practice. Teachers College Press.

Cameron, D. (2000). Good to talk?: Living and working in a communication culture. Sage.

Cohen, D. K. (2011). Teaching and its predicaments. Harvard University Press.

Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). (2012). 2013 CASEL guide: Effective social and emotional learning programs—Preschool and elementary school edition. CASEL.

Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). (2017). Examples of social and emotional learning in elementary English language arts instruction. CASEL. https://www.casel.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/SEL-in-Elementary-ELA-8-20-17.pdf

Copland, F., & Creese, A. (2015). Linguistic ethnography: Collecting, analysing and presenting data. Sage.

Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2005). Excellence and enjoyment: Social and emotional aspects of learning: Guidance. DfES.

Domitrovich, C. E., Durlak, J. A., Staley, K. C., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Social‐emotional competence: An essential factor for promoting positive adjustment and reducing risk in school children. Child Development, 88(2), 408-416.

Dusenbury, L., Weissberg, R. P., Goren, P., & Domitrovich, C. (2014). State standards to advance social and emotional learning: Findings from CASEL’s state scan of social and emotional learning standards, preschool through high school, 2014. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL).

Dutro, E. (2008). ‘That's why I was crying on this book’: Trauma as testimony in responses to literature. Changing English, 15(4), 423-434.

Ecclestone, K. (2012). From emotional and psychological well-being to character education: Challenging policy discourses of behavioural science and ‘vulnerability’. Research Papers in Education, 27(4), 463-480.

Effrem, K., & Robbins, J. (2019). Social-emotional learning: K–12 education as new age Nanny State (White Paper 192). Pioneer Institute.

Elias, M. J., & Moceri, D. C. (2012). Developing social and emotional aspects of learning: The American experience. Research Papers in Education, 27(4), 423-434.

Evans, R. (2017). Emotional pedagogy and the gendering of social and emotional learning. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(2), 184-202.

Figueredo, C. J. (2020). Sink or swim? Responsible situated agency constructed by socioeconomically underprivileged students of English in neoliberal Brazil. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 8.

Gillies, V. (2011). Social and emotional pedagogies: Critiquing the new orthodoxy of emotion in classroom behaviour management. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(2), 185-202.

Gutierrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: Brown, James Versus Brown V Board-of-Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 445-471.

Hakim, E. (2021). You’ve got the disease: how disgust in child culture shapes school bullying. Ethnography and Education, 16(2), 210-225.

Harvard University. (n.d.). Navigate the complex field of social and emotional learning. Retrieved from http://exploresel.gse.harvard.edu.

Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Economics, 19(4), 451-464.

Hoffman, D. M. (2009). Reflecting on social emotional learning: A critical perspective on trends in the United States. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 533-556.

Jones, S., Brush, K., Bailey, R., Brion-Meisels, G., McIntyre, J., Kahn, J., ... Stickle, L. (2017). Navigating SEL from the inside out: Looking inside and across 25 leading SEL programs: A practical resource for schools and OST providers elementary school focus. Harvard Graduate School of Education with Funding from the Wallace Foundation.

Jones, S., & Myhill, D. (2004). 'Troublesome boys' and 'compliant girls': Gender identity and perceptions of achievement and underachievement. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(5), 547-561.

Junehui, A. (2010). 'I'm not scared of anything': Emotion as social power in children's worlds. Childhood, 17, 94-112.

Keddie, A., & Mills, M. (2009). Disrupting masculinised spaces: Teachers working for gender justice. Research Papers in Education, 24(1), 29-43.

Lefstein, A. & Snell, J. (2014). Better than Best Practice: Developing Teaching and Learning through Dialogue. London: Routledge.

McDermott, R. P., & Gospodinoff, K. (1979). Social context for ethnic borders and school failure. In A. Wolfgang (Ed.), Nonverbal behavior: Applications and cultural implications (pp. 175-195). Academic Press.

McNeil, L. M. (1982). Defensive teaching and classroom control. In M. Apple & L. Weis (Eds.), Ideology and practice in schooling. Temple University Press.

Merrell, K. W., & Gueldner, B. A. (2010). Social and emotional learning in the classroom: Promoting mental health and academic success. Guilford Publications.

Mitchell, J. C. (1983). Case and Situation Analysis. Sociological Review, 31(2), 187-211.

Morcom, V. (2015). Scaffolding social and emotional learning within 'shared affective spaces' to reduce bullying: A sociocultural perspective. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6, 77-86.

Myhill, D., & Jones, S. (2006). 'She doesn't shout at no girls': pupils' perceptions of gender equity in the classroom. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 99-113.

Näykki, P., Isohätälä, J., & Järvelä, S. (2021). ‘You really brought all your feelings out’–Scaffolding students to identify the socio-emotional and socio-cognitive challenges in collaborative learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30, 100536.

Netz, H., & Segal, A. (2021). Narratives in the classroom: A tale of affordances and missed opportunities. Linguistics and Education, 64, 100937.

Nils, F., & Rimé, B. (2012). Beyond the myth of venting: Social sharing modes determine the benefits of emotional disclosure. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(6), 672-681.

Rampton, B. (2006). Language in late modernity: Interaction in an urban school (Vol. 22). Cambridge University Press.

Rampton, B., Maybin, J., & Roberts, C. (2015). Theory and method in linguistic ethnography. In J. Snell, S. Shaw, & F. Copland (Eds.), Linguistic ethnography (pp. 14-50). Palgrave Macmillan.

Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C. S. C., & Clarke, S. N. (Eds.). (2015). Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue. Washington, DC: AERA.

Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. A. (2019). Designing professional development to support teachers' facilitation of argumentation. In N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, & L. Major (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education (pp. 254-268). Taylor and Francis.

Schaffalitzky, C. (2022). What makes authentic questions authentic? Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 10, A30-A42. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2022.428

Segal, A., & Lefstein, A. J. (2016). Exuberant, voiceless participation: An unintended consequence of dialogic sensibilities?. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 1-19.

Shoshana, A. (2017). Ethnographies of 'A Lesson in Racism': Class, ethnicity, and the supremacy of the psychological discourse. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 48(1), 61-76.

Smith, M. P. (2019). Bullying and interpersonal conflict from a “dialogic event” perspective. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 7.

Stearns, C. (2017). Affect in the classroom: A psychoanalytic and cultural exploration of social and emotional learning. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of New Hampshire, Durham. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/2300

Stearns, C. (2018). Unruly affect in the kindergarten classroom: A critical analysis of social-emotional learning. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 19(1), 8-19.

Teräsahjo, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2003). ‘She is not actually bullied’: The discourse of harassment in student groups. Aggressive Behavior, 29(2), 134-154.

The Aspen Institute. (2019). Integrating social, emotional and academic development: An action guide for school leadership teams.

Walton, D. N. (1998). The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. University of Toronto Press.

Wilce, J. M., & Fenigsen, J. (2016). Emotion pedagogies: What are they, and why do they matter? Ethos, 44(2), 81-95.

Wood, P. (2020). Emotional intelligence and social and emotional learning: Misinterpretation of theory and its influence on practice. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(1), 153-166.

Wood, P., & Brownhill, S. (2018). 'Absent fathers' and children's social and emotional learning: An exploration of the perceptions of 'positive male role models' in the primary school sector. Gender and Education, 30(2), 172-186.

Yoder, N. (2014). Teaching the whole child instructional practices that support SEL in three teacher evaluation frameworks. Center on Great Teachers and Leaders, American Institutes for Research.