“They go hand in hand”: Dialogic pedagogy and linguistic belonging in two elementary classrooms
Main Article Content
Abstract
Elementary school children bring a rich diversity of language to classrooms, a richness that often goes undervalued in educational settings in which teachers feel they must and do emphasize dominant ways of using English. The ways in which teachers interact with children about their language use can influence the linguistic belonging of children from nondominant linguistic backgrounds—their sense of being loved, valued, included, and recognized in positive ways for how they use and understand language. This work addresses connections between dialogic pedagogy and the belonging of multilingual children in two California, English-dominant elementary classrooms. The manuscript centers on the following questions: (1) How did teachers view dialogic instruction and plan dialogically? (2) What did dialogic instruction look like when enacted in these two classrooms? (3) How did dialogic instruction–including professional care and love for multilingual children–relate to the linguistic belonging of multilingual children in these two classrooms? The study concludes that these teachers saw dialogic instruction and the belonging of multilingual children as connected and that they worked hard to find space for dialogic instruction within scripted and district-planned curricula. During dialogic instruction, teachers accepted answers that were not conventionally correct, honored and demonstrated care for students and embraced multiple, diverse ways of expressing answers from their students, including affirming multilingual student language use that did not conform to dominant English standards. Dialogic pedagogy contributed to the belonging of multilingual children in these two classrooms.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
References
Aerila, J-A., Kinossalo, M., Siipola, M., Laaksonen, P., Lamminen, A, & Valkonen, T (2022). Deep Talk: A Dialogic Instruction Method for Enhancing the Sense of Belonging. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(6), 89-96. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.6.490.
Alexander, R. J. (2006). Towards Dialogic Teaching. York: Dialogos.
Alexander, R. J. (2018). “Developing Dialogic Teaching: Genesis, Process, Trial.” Research Papers in Education, 33 (5): 561–598. doi:10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140.
Aukerman, M. (2013). Rereading comprehension pedagogies: Toward a dialogic teaching ethic that honors student sensemaking, Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal 1(1): 1-20.
Aukerman, M and Boyd, M. (2019). Mapping the terrain of dialogic literacy pedagogies. In The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education. New York: Routledge, pp. 373-385.
Murdock-Perriera, L.A. (2022). “I’m ready for this conversation”: Linguistic Belonging and
discussions about language and power in elementary classrooms. Professing Education 20 (1). p. 16-37.
Barnes, D., J. Britton, and H. Rosen. (1969). Language, the Learner and the School. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bucholtz, M. (2000). The politics of transcription Journal of pragmatics 32(10): 1439-1465.
Bucholtz, M. (2007). Variation in transcription Discourse Studies 9(6): 784-808.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). The bioecological model from a life course perspective: Reflections of a participant observer. In Moen P., Elder GH., and Lüscher K. (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development. American Psychological Association: 599-618. https://doi.org/10.1037/10176-017
Cazden, C., (Ed) (1972). The Functions of Language in the Classroom. New York: Teachers’ College Press, Columbia University.
Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., and Vigdor, J. (2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review 24(4): 377-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.06.008
Corbin, J., Strauss, A., and Strauss, A.L. (2014). Basics of qualitative research. California: Sage.
Cornelius, L/ L., and Herrenkohl, L. R. (2014). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students' relationships with each other and with concepts. In Investigating Participant Structures in the Context of Science Instruction. New York: Routledge, pp. 467-498.
Cui, R. & Teo, P. (2020). Dialogic education for classroom teaching: a critical review. Language and education, 35(3), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1837859
Ferrada, D. (2020). Dialogic pedagogy linking worlds: participatory community classrooms. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 28(1), 131-146.
Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of Hope. Reliving Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Translated by Robert R. Barr. New York: Continuum
Fujii, R. R. (2015). Critical and multicultural pedagogy of elementary social studies in Hawaii (Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai'i at Manoa).
Green, J., Franquiz, M., and Dixon, C. (1997). The myth of the objective transcript: Transcribing as a situated act Tesol Quarterly 31(1): 172-176.
Hennessy, S., Calcagni, E., Leung, A., & Mercer, N. (2023). An analysis of the forms of teacher-student dialogue that are most productive for learning. Language and Education, 37(2), 186-211. DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2021.1956943.
Kim, M.-Y., and I. A. G. Wilkinson. (2019). “What is Dialogic Teaching? Constructing, Deconstructing, and Reconstructing a Pedagogy of Classroom Talk.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 21: 70–86. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.003.
Kvale, S., and Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research. California, US: SAGE.
Langeloo, A., Mascareño Lara, M., Deunk, M. I., Klitzing, N. F., & Strijbos, J. W. (2019). A systematic review of teacher–child interactions with multilingual young children. Review of Educational Research, 89(4), 536-568. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465431985561
Lefstein, A., & Snell, J. (2013). Better than best practice: Developing teaching and learning through dialogue. Routledge.
Lincoln, Y.S., and Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry, Beverly Hills, C.A.: Sage Publications.
MacIver, M. A., & Kemper, E. (2002). The impact of Direct Instruction on elementary students' reading achievement in an urban school district. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 7(2), 197-220.
Martínez, R.A. (2013). Reading the world in Spanglish: Hybrid language practices and ideological contestation in a sixth-grade English language arts classroom. Linguistics and Education 24(3): 276-288.
McQuillan, J., and Tse, L. (1995). Child language brokering in linguistic minority communities: Effects on cultural interaction, cognition, and literacy. Language and Education 9(3): 195-215.
Mercer, N., and Dawes, L. (2014). “The Study of Talk between Teachers and Students, from the 1970s Until the 2010s.” Oxford Review of Education 40 (4): 430–445. doi:10.1080/03054985.2014.934087.
Nystrand, M. (1997). Dialogic instruction: When recitation becomes conversation. Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom pp. 1-29.
Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory Developmental pragmatics 10(1): 43-72.
Parkes, B. (2023). Read it again!: revisiting shared reading. Routledge.
Sedova, K. (2021). Is dialogic teaching sustainable? Portrait of a teacher three years after completing a teacher development programme. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 9, A37-A59.
Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences New York: Teachers college press.
Smith, J.A., Flowers, P., and Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Approach: Theory, Method and research. California: SAGE.
Snell, J., & Cushing, I. (2022). “A lot of them write how they speak”: policy, pedagogy and the policing of ‘nonstandard’ English. Literacy, 56(3), 199-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12298.
Teo, P. (2019). Teaching for the 21st century: A case for dialogic pedagogy. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 170-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.03.009.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Digest of Education Statistics, 2016 (NCES 2017-094).
Valdés, G. (2014). Heritage language students: Profiles and possibilities. In Handbook of heritage, community, and native American languages in the United States New York: Routledge: pp. 41-49.
Wenger, R. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilkinson, I. A., Reznitskaya, A., Bourdage, K., Oyler, J., Glina, M., Drewry, R., ... & Nelson, K. (2017). Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: Changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms. Language and education, 31(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1230129
Zemel, A., & Koschmann, T. (2011). Pursuing a question: Reinitiating IRE sequences as a method of instruction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 475-488.