A happy system crasher at home and in conventional and democratic schools

Main Article Content

Eugene Matusov

Abstract

Often, “system crashers” are portrayed as disturbed children (students) who actively break the institutional system work and disturb relationships with other people. However, some system crashers are perfectly happy children who, precisely due to their happiness, liveliness, and rich imagination, do not fit into a conventional school. In this paper, I provide a detailed case of such a happy system crasher at home and in conventional and democratic schools. I found out that at home, the parents of the system crasher often reflected and rethought their parenting practices, priorities, and values to shelter their child’s happy life, often at a great expense for themselves. In contrast, the conventional school either ignored or punished the happy system crasher to preserve its institutional practices and keep them smooth. I hypothesize that conventional school is aimed at promoting a disciplinary society by making students convenient, obedient, and useful citizens at the expense of the student’s authorial agency. In contrast, parents and democratic schools address a happy system crasher’s disruption of their lives by rethinking and renegotiating their practices. Finally, I argue that happy system crashers are essential for Democratic and Dialogic Education.

Article Details

How to Cite
Matusov, E. (2024). A happy system crasher at home and in conventional and democratic schools. Dialogic Pedagogy: A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education, 12(1), E36-E57. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2024.626
Section
Editorials
Author Biography

Eugene Matusov, University of Delaware, United States

Eugene Matusov is a Professor of Education at the University of Delaware. He studied developmental psychology with Soviet researchers working in the Vygotskian paradigm and worked as a schoolteacher before immigrating to the United States. He uses sociocultural and Bakhtinian dialogic approaches to education. His current research and practice focus is on Democratic Dialogic Education. His recent books include: Matusov, E. (2020), "Envisioning education in a post-work leisure-based society: A dialogic perspective." Matusov, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A., & Gradovski, M. (2019), "Dialogic pedagogy and polyphonic research art: Bakhtin by and for educators."

References

Fendler, L. (1998). What is it impossible to think? A genealogy of the educated subject. In T. S. Popkewitz & M. Brennan (Eds.), Foucault's challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education (pp. 39-63). New York: Teachers College Press.

Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (2nd Vintage Books ed.). New York: Vintage Books.

Greenberg, D. (1991). Free at last: The Sudbury Valley School. Framingham, MA: Sudbury Valley School Press.

Llewellyn, G. (1998). The teenage liberation handbook: How to quit school and get a real life and education (Rev., 2nd ed ed.). Eugene, OR: Lowry House.

Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

Matusov, E. (2015). Legitimacy of non-negotiable imposition in diverse approaches to education. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 3, A174-A211. Retrieved from http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/110/105

Matusov, E. (2017). Nikolai N. Konstantinov’s authorial math pedagogy for people with wings: Special issue. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 54(1), 1-117, doi:10.1080/10610405.2017.1352391.

Matusov, E. (2018). Ideological and real socialism of my Soviet childhood, schooling, and teaching: Multi-consciousness. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 6, SC4-SC39, doi:10.5195/dpj.2018.240.

Matusov, E. (2020a). Dialogic analysis of the teacher’s pedagogical decision-making in a lesson on the educational controversies of religious holidays in a dialogic multi-regime college classroom. In M. C. Oliveira, A. U. Branco, & S. F. Freire (Eds.), Psychology as a Dialogical Science: Self and culture mutual development (pp. 29-50). New York: Springer International Publishing.

Matusov, E. (2020b). Envisioning education in a post-work leisure-based society: A dialogic perspective. New York: Palgrave.

Matusov, E. (2021a). Progressive education is the opium of the educators. integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1-34.

Matusov, E. (2021b). The relationship between education and learning and its consequences for dialogic pedagogy. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 9, E1-E19, doi:10.5195/dpj.2021.425.

Matusov, E. (2021c). Teacher as a benevolent dictator. In R. L. Hampel (Ed.), Radical Teaching in Turbulent Times: Martin Duberman's Princeton Seminars, 1966–1970 (pp. 207-226). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Matusov, E. (2022). The teachers’ pedagogical fiduciary duty to their students. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1-26, doi:10.1007/s12124-022-09690-8.

Matusov, E. (2023). Teacher as a benevolent dictator: Promoting an educational culture of democratic dialogic education. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 11(2), A245 - A260, doi:10.5195/dpj.2023.331.

Matusov, E. (2024, submitted). Student authorial agency in the three educational paradigms: Conventional, Progressive, and Democratic. In J. Valsiner & K. Carriere (Eds.), The International Handbook on Cultural Political Psychology: Springer.

Matusov, E., & Brobst, J. (2013). Radical experiment in dialogic pedagogy in higher education and its centaur failure: Chronotopic analysis. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

Matusov, E., & Lemke, J. L. (2015). Values in dialogic pedagogy (Editorial). Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 3, E1-E20, doi:0.5195/dpj.2015.141.

Matusov, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A., & Meacham, S. (2016). Pedagogical voyeurism: Dialogic critique of documentation and assessment of learning. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 5(1), 1-26. doi:10.17583/ijep.2016.1886

Matusov, E., & Sullivan, P. (2020). Pedagogical violence. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54(2), 438-464, doi:10.1007/s12124-019-09512-4.

Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Mapping concepts of agency in educational contexts. integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 420–446, doi:10.1007/s12124-015-9334-2.

Matusov, L. (2006). Тени минувшего [The shadowes of the gone]. Semi Valley, CA: Lulu.

McDermott, R. P., & Varenne, H. (1998). Adam, Adam, Adam, and Adam: The cultural construction of a learning disability. In H. Varenne & R. P. McDermott (Eds.), Successful failure: The school America builds (pp. 25-44). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view (1st ed.). New York,: Harper & Row.

Neill, A. S. (1960). Summerhill: A radical approach to child rearing. New York: Hart Publishing Company.

Rietmulder, J. (2019). When kids rule the school: The power and promise of democratic education. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.

Stirner, M. (1963). The Ego and his own: The case of the individual against authority (S. T. Byington, Trans.). New York: Libertarian Book Club.

Tolstoy, L. (1967). Tolstoy on education (L. Wiener, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Willis, P. E. (1981). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs (Morningside ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.