A happy system crasher at home and in conventional and democratic schools
Main Article Content
Abstract
Often, “system crashers” are portrayed as disturbed children (students) who actively break the institutional system work and disturb relationships with other people. However, some system crashers are perfectly happy children who, precisely due to their happiness, liveliness, and rich imagination, do not fit into a conventional school. In this paper, I provide a detailed case of such a happy system crasher at home and in conventional and democratic schools. I found out that at home, the parents of the system crasher often reflected and rethought their parenting practices, priorities, and values to shelter their child’s happy life, often at a great expense for themselves. In contrast, the conventional school either ignored or punished the happy system crasher to preserve its institutional practices and keep them smooth. I hypothesize that conventional school is aimed at promoting a disciplinary society by making students convenient, obedient, and useful citizens at the expense of the student’s authorial agency. In contrast, parents and democratic schools address a happy system crasher’s disruption of their lives by rethinking and renegotiating their practices. Finally, I argue that happy system crashers are essential for Democratic and Dialogic Education.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
References
Fendler, L. (1998). What is it impossible to think? A genealogy of the educated subject. In T. S. Popkewitz & M. Brennan (Eds.), Foucault's challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education (pp. 39-63). New York: Teachers College Press.
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (2nd Vintage Books ed.). New York: Vintage Books.
Greenberg, D. (1991). Free at last: The Sudbury Valley School. Framingham, MA: Sudbury Valley School Press.
Llewellyn, G. (1998). The teenage liberation handbook: How to quit school and get a real life and education (Rev., 2nd ed ed.). Eugene, OR: Lowry House.
Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Matusov, E. (2015). Legitimacy of non-negotiable imposition in diverse approaches to education. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 3, A174-A211. Retrieved from http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/110/105
Matusov, E. (2017). Nikolai N. Konstantinov’s authorial math pedagogy for people with wings: Special issue. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 54(1), 1-117, doi:10.1080/10610405.2017.1352391.
Matusov, E. (2018). Ideological and real socialism of my Soviet childhood, schooling, and teaching: Multi-consciousness. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 6, SC4-SC39, doi:10.5195/dpj.2018.240.
Matusov, E. (2020a). Dialogic analysis of the teacher’s pedagogical decision-making in a lesson on the educational controversies of religious holidays in a dialogic multi-regime college classroom. In M. C. Oliveira, A. U. Branco, & S. F. Freire (Eds.), Psychology as a Dialogical Science: Self and culture mutual development (pp. 29-50). New York: Springer International Publishing.
Matusov, E. (2020b). Envisioning education in a post-work leisure-based society: A dialogic perspective. New York: Palgrave.
Matusov, E. (2021a). Progressive education is the opium of the educators. integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1-34.
Matusov, E. (2021b). The relationship between education and learning and its consequences for dialogic pedagogy. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 9, E1-E19, doi:10.5195/dpj.2021.425.
Matusov, E. (2021c). Teacher as a benevolent dictator. In R. L. Hampel (Ed.), Radical Teaching in Turbulent Times: Martin Duberman's Princeton Seminars, 1966–1970 (pp. 207-226). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Matusov, E. (2022). The teachers’ pedagogical fiduciary duty to their students. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1-26, doi:10.1007/s12124-022-09690-8.
Matusov, E. (2023). Teacher as a benevolent dictator: Promoting an educational culture of democratic dialogic education. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 11(2), A245 - A260, doi:10.5195/dpj.2023.331.
Matusov, E. (2024, submitted). Student authorial agency in the three educational paradigms: Conventional, Progressive, and Democratic. In J. Valsiner & K. Carriere (Eds.), The International Handbook on Cultural Political Psychology: Springer.
Matusov, E., & Brobst, J. (2013). Radical experiment in dialogic pedagogy in higher education and its centaur failure: Chronotopic analysis. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Matusov, E., & Lemke, J. L. (2015). Values in dialogic pedagogy (Editorial). Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 3, E1-E20, doi:0.5195/dpj.2015.141.
Matusov, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A., & Meacham, S. (2016). Pedagogical voyeurism: Dialogic critique of documentation and assessment of learning. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 5(1), 1-26. doi:10.17583/ijep.2016.1886
Matusov, E., & Sullivan, P. (2020). Pedagogical violence. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54(2), 438-464, doi:10.1007/s12124-019-09512-4.
Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Mapping concepts of agency in educational contexts. integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 420–446, doi:10.1007/s12124-015-9334-2.
Matusov, L. (2006). Тени минувшего [The shadowes of the gone]. Semi Valley, CA: Lulu.
McDermott, R. P., & Varenne, H. (1998). Adam, Adam, Adam, and Adam: The cultural construction of a learning disability. In H. Varenne & R. P. McDermott (Eds.), Successful failure: The school America builds (pp. 25-44). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view (1st ed.). New York,: Harper & Row.
Neill, A. S. (1960). Summerhill: A radical approach to child rearing. New York: Hart Publishing Company.
Rietmulder, J. (2019). When kids rule the school: The power and promise of democratic education. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.
Stirner, M. (1963). The Ego and his own: The case of the individual against authority (S. T. Byington, Trans.). New York: Libertarian Book Club.
Tolstoy, L. (1967). Tolstoy on education (L. Wiener, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Willis, P. E. (1981). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs (Morningside ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.