Dialogic Learning as a Lever for Equity: Teacher Strategies in Indonesian Low-SES Classrooms
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates how dialogic pedagogy could potentially serve as a lever for equity in elementary classrooms in Indonesia with low socioeconomic status. Addressing concerns that inclusive education is often reduced to participation or classroom management, the study examines how inclusion is enacted, negotiated, and contested through everyday classroom dialogue. Drawing on a six-month ethnographic qualitative design, data were generated through prolonged classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with six teachers and twenty-one students, and detailed field notes. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted to interpret interactional practices within their social and institutional contexts.
The findings identify five interrelated pedagogical strategies: dialogic learning, building personal closeness, providing personal guidance, confirming student understanding, and offering appreciation and rewards. Dialogic learning emerged as the central practice through which students’ contributions reshaped the trajectory of classroom activity, enabling moments of co-authorship, epistemic uncertainty, and ethical recognition. In these dialogic encounters, students were positioned not merely as participants but as co-authors of meaning whose lived experiences and disagreements reoriented collective inquiry. At the same time, the study reveals tensions in which some inclusive practices, particularly reward-based participation, constrained dialogic openness by reasserting evaluative authority.
The study concludes that dialogic pedagogy functions not as a technical method but as an ethical and political practice through which equity is continually negotiated. It contributes to the scholarship on dialogic pedagogy by offering a context-sensitive analysis of how dialogic events emerge, fracture, and coexist with institutional demands in under-resourced classrooms.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
References
Abduh, M., Purwanta, E., & Hermanto, H. (2023). In what ways students’ socio-economic status affecting academic performance? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23260
Alexander, R. (2013). Essays on Pedagogy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203609309
Alexander, R. (2020a). A Dialogic Teaching Companion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351040143
Alexander, R. (2020b). A Dialogic Teaching Companion. Routledge.
Allan, J. (2010). The sociology of disability and the struggle for inclusive education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(5), 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2010.500093
Audley-Piotrowski, S., Singer, A., & Patterson, M. (2015). The role of the teacher in children’s peer relations: Making the invisible hand intentional. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1(2), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000038
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
Boyd, M. P., & Markarian, W. C. (2011). Dialogic teaching: talk in service of a dialogic stance. Language and Education, 25(6), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.597861
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research Psychology. 77–101.
Dewi, N. R. K., & Palupi, P. (2023). Islamic Elementary School Teachers’ Uncertainty on Distance Learning. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v10i1.4064
García-Carrión, R., López de Aguileta, G., Padrós, M., & Ramis-Salas, M. (2020a). Implications for Social Impact of Dialogic Teaching and Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00140
García-Carrión, R., López de Aguileta, G., Padrós, M., & Ramis-Salas, M. (2020b). Implications for Social Impact of Dialogic Teaching and Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00140
Hamston, J. (2006). Bakhtin’s theory of dialogue: A construct for pedagogy, methodology and analysis. The Australian Educational Researcher, 33(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03246281
Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: a systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024
Irshad, M. A., & Shaharyar Rafaqat, M. (2024). Towards Inclusive Classrooms: Identification of the Role of Teachers in Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 13(3), 1323–1332. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2024.13.3.108
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage.
Liu, J. (2019). Students in Poverty: How to Keep Persistent in Schooling—A Case Study on the Poor Students’ Pursuing Schooling Experience in Different Ages of China. International Journal of Education, 11(4), 17. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v11i4.15505
Mamas, C., Cohen, S. R., & Holtzman, C. (2024). Relational Inclusivity in the Elementary Classroom. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003398738
Matusov, E. (2021). The relationship between education and learning and its consequences for dialogic pedagogy. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 9, E1–E19. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2021.425
Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2018). Beyond equality and inequality in education: Bakhtinian dialogic ethics approach of human uniqueness to educational justice. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 6. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2018.236
Matusov, E., Smith, M., Soslau, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A., & Von Duyke, K. (2016). Dialogic education for and from authorial agency. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 4. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2016.172
Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2019). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007
Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Major, L. (2019). The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education. Rutledge.
Messiou, K., de los Reyes, J., Potnis, C., Dong, P., & Rwang, V. K. (2025). Student voice for promoting inclusion in primary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 29(7), 1168–1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2024.2317729
Monteiro, V., Carvalho, C., & Santos, N. N. (2021). Creating a Supportive Classroom Environment Through Effective Feedback: Effects on Students’ School Identification and Behavioral Engagement. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.661736
Navarro-Mateu, D., Gómez-Domínguez, T., Padrós Cuxart, M., & Roca-Campos, E. (2021). Dialogic Learning Environments That Enhance Instrumental Learning and Inclusion of Students With Special Needs in Secondary Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662650
Nugraha, A. E., Minsih, M., & Wulandari, M. D. (2025). Exploring the challenges of children with special needs in the learning process at an inclusive primary school in Surakarta. BIS Education, 1, V125011. https://doi.org/10.31603/bised.158
Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R., & Prendergast, C. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. Teachers College Press.
Nzuza, Z. D., & Sulaimon, J. T. (2025). Conceptualising Inclusive Education: Insights from South African Primary School Principals. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v7i1.23615
Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C. S. C., & Clarke, S. N. (2015). Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue. American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1
Ruitenberg, C. W. (2010). Learning to Articulate: From Ethical Motivation to Political Demands. In Philosophy of Education (pp. 372–380). Philosophy of Education Society.
Ruitenberg, C. W. (2011). The Empty Chair: Education in an Ethic of Hospitality. Philosophy of Education, 67, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.47925/2011.028
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000340
Seidman, I. (2019). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Selvitopu, A., & Kaya, M. (2021). A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Academic Performance. Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211031978
Sidorkin, A. (2023). Pedagogy of Relation and Educational Communities. International Review of Theoretical Psychologies, 2(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.7146/irtp.v2i1.142790
Slee, R. (2019). Belonging in an age of exclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(9), 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1602366
Snell, J., & Lefstein, A. (2018). “Low Ability,” Participation, and Identity in Dialogic Pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 40–78. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217730010
van Nes, F., Abma, T., Jonsson, H., & Deeg, D. (2010). Language differences in qualitative research: is meaning lost in translation? European Journal of Ageing, 7(4), 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-010-0168-y
Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic, Education and Technology: Expanding the space of learning. Springer.
Zitomer, M. R. (2017). Always being on your toes: elementary school dance teachers’ perceptions of inclusion and their roles in creating inclusive dance education environments. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(4), 428–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1197327