Bullying and interpersonal conflict from a “dialogic event” perspective

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Sep 25, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2019.259
Keywords:
Ontological dialogue dialogic pedagogy bullying class meetings interpersonal conflict Bakhtin and education K-12 progressive schools Kantian ethics moral education

Main Article Content

Mark Philip Smith
Kean University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3468-4733

Abstract

Through discussions in class meetings of “concrete situations” experienced by students in their lived experience in and out of the classroom, educators have been encouraged to guide students to understand how bullying applies to their lives, and to learn the degree to which bullying is present or absent in their relationships with their peers (Olweus, 1993). In observations of and interviews about the class meetings at a private, progressive U.S. middle school, student and teacher discourses in response to students’ interpersonal dynamics are found to exist within separate, parallel universes. The teachers’ discourse universe presumes that the lived experience of students can be understood through and guided by abstract, Kantian-like moral universal imperatives – specifically, the imperative to “feel good” and the imperative not to bully. These imperatives supplant dialogue on the events of students’ experiences toward a focus on who the students are becoming rather than who they are now. This discourse of “half-being” maps the students’ experiences upon what is known, predictable, universal, unsurprising and imagined, and assumes that students are not fully responsible for their own or each other’s well-being. By contrast, the students’ discourse on their interpersonal dynamics is characterized by Bakhtin’s (1993) notion of “being-as-event” discourse, which is highly contextualized, unpredictable, and focuses upon everyone’s responsibility to ongoing dramatic and ontologically charged events (either immediate or recursive in nature). The students’ discursive universe is conducive to dialogue, whereas the teachers’ discursive universe supplants the students’ messy, unpredictable and dialogically responsible discourse, thus arresting the possibility for teachers and peers to provide meaningful and authoritative guidance to dialogic events. The reasons for teachers’ attraction to Kantian-like abstract moral universals as well as the consequences of the supplanting of students’ event-filled discourse with the discourse of bullying are discussed

Article Details

How to Cite
Smith, M. P. (2019). Bullying and interpersonal conflict from a “dialogic event” perspective. Dialogic Pedagogy: A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2019.259
Issue
Vol. 7 (2019)
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link. 

Author Biography

Mark Philip Smith, Kean University

Lecturer, School of English Studies

References

Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Rev. and extended ed.). New York: Verso.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1991). Dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act (1st ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1999). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics (Vol. 8). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Bakhtin, M. M., Holquist, M., & Liapunov, V. (1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays (1st ed.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Barchay, J. (2018, September 28). Early evidence of a 'Trump effect' on bullying in schools. Retrieved from https://hechingerreport.org/early-evidence-of-a-trump-effect-on-bullying-in-schools/

Benhabib, S. (1987). The generalised and the concrete other. In S. Benhabib & D. Cornell (Eds.), Feminism as Critique: On the Politics of Gender (pp. 77-95). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Besag, V. E. (2006). Bullying among girls: Friends or foes? School Psychology International, 27(5), 535-551. doi:10.1177/0143034306073401

Bettelheim, B. (1960). The informed heart: Autonomy in a mass age. Glencoe, IL.: Free Press.

Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cormier, A.-A., & Brighouse, H. (2019). Creating civil citizens? The value and limits of teaching civility in schools. In C. M. Macleod & C. Tappolet (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives on moral and civic education: Shaping citizens and their schools (pp. 68-85). New York: Routledge.

Delfabbro, P., Winefield, T., Trainor, S., Dollard, M., Anderson, S., Metzer, J., & Hammarstrom, A. (2006). Peer and teacher bullying/victimization of South Australian secondary school students: Prevalence and psychosocial profiles. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 71-90. doi:10.1348/000709904X24645

Dennison, G. (1970). The Lives of Children: The Story of the First Street School. New York: Vintage Books.

Dixon, R. (2011). Rethinking school bullying: Towards an integrated model. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Doll, B., Song, S., & Siemers, E. (2004). Classroom ecologies that support or discourage bullying. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. (pp. 161-183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Due, P., Merlo, J., Harel-Fisch, Y., Damsgaard, M. T., Holstein, B. E., Hetland, J., . . . Lynch, J. (2009). Socioeconomic inequality in exposure to bullying during adolescence: A comparative, cross-sectional, multilevel study in 35 countries. American journal of public health, 99(5), 907-914. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.139303

Fast, J. (2016). Beyond bullying: Breaking the cycle of shame, bullying, and violence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Galloway, D., & Roland, E. (2004). Is the direct approach to reducing bullying always the best? In P. K. Smith, D. J. Pepler, & K. Rigby (Eds.), Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be? (pp. 37-53). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Graebner, W. (1990). Coming of Age in Buffalo: Youth and Authority in the Postwar Era. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Heidegger, M., & Stambaugh, J. (1996). Being and time. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Holt, J. C. (1964). How children fail. New York: Delta.

Holt, J. C. (1970). What do I do Monday? New York: Dutton.

Holt, J. C. (1972). Freedom and beyond (1st ed.). New York,: E. P. Dutton.

Horne, A. M., Orpinas, P., Newman-Carlson, D., & Bartolomucci, C. L. (2004). Elementary School Bully Busters Program: Understanding why children bully and what to do about it. In Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. (pp. 297-325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Kennedy, M. M. (2005). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Klas, R., & Suprenant, C. W. (2012). Introduction: The highest good: The moral endeavor of education. In K. Roth & C. W. Surprenant (Eds.), Kant and Education: Interpretations and Commentary (pp. ix-xxiv). New York: Routledge.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lave, J. (1992). Word problems: A microcosm of theories of learning. In P. Light & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Context and cognition: Ways of learning and knowing. (pp. 74-92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Lefstein, A., Pollak, I., & Segal, A. (2018). Compelling student voice: Dialogic practices of public confession. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education (2018, May), 1-14. doi:10.1080/01596306.2018.1473341

Lewin, K. (1943). Defining the 'field at a given time.'. Psychological Review, 50(3), 292-310. doi:10.1037/h0062738

Lewin, K., Lippit, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggression in experimentally created "social climates.” The Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-299. doi:10.1080/00224545.1939.9713366

Limber, S. P., Nation, M., Tracy, A. J., Melton, G. B., & Flerx, V. (2004). Implementation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention programme in the Southeastern United States. In D. Pepler, K. Rigby, & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be? (pp. 55-80). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Løvlie, L. (2012). Kant’s invitation to educational thinking. In K. Roth & C. W. Surprenant (Eds.), Kant and Education: Interpretations and Commentary (pp. 107-123). New York: Routledge.

Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173-192. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x

Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

Matusov, E. (2010). Dialogic Pedagogy. Retrieved from http://diaped.soe.udel.edu/dp-map/

Matusov, E., DePalma, R., & Smith, M. P. (2010). The creation and maintenance of a “learning-loving minority” in conventional high schools: A research-based response to John Ogbu. Oxford Review of Education, 36(4). doi:10.1080/03054985.2010.491186

Matusov, E., & Smith, M. P. (2007). Teaching imaginary children: University students’ narratives about their Latino practicum children. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 705-729. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.012

Matusov, E., & Smith, M. P. (2009a). The collapse of internally persuasive discourse in Vivian Paley’s classroom. In E. Matusov (Ed.), Journey into Dialogic Pedagogy (pp. 253-286). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

Matusov, E., & Smith, M. P. (2009b). Internally persuasive discourse and its collapse in Ms. Vivian Paley’s classroom. In E. Matusov (Ed.), Journey into Dialogic Pedagogy (pp. 207-252). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

Matusov, E., St. Julien, J., & Hayes, R. (2005). Building a Creole educational community as the goal of multicultural education for preservice teachers. In L. V. Barnes (Ed.), Contemporary Teaching and Teacher Issues (pp. 1-38). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Mayo, C. (2002). The binds that tie: Civility and social difference. Educational Theory, 52(2), 169-186. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2002.00169.x

McDermott, R. P. (1988). Inarticulatedness. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Linguistics in context (pp. 37-68). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Mishna, F. (2012). Bullying: A guide to research, intervention, and prevention. New York: Oxford University Press.

Morson, G. S. (2004). The process of ideological becoming. In A. F. Ball & S. W. Freedman (Eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning (pp. 317-331). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Morson, G. S., & Emerson, C. (1991). Rethinking Bakhtin: Extensions and challenges. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Digest of Education Statistics: 2009 (NCES 2010-013). Retrieved from: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d09/

Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Ontology. (1989). In J. A. Simpson & E. S. C. Weiner (Eds.), Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

Paley, V. G. (1992). You can't say you can't play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Pepler, D. J., Craig, W. M., O'Connell, P., Atlas, R., & Charach, A. (2004). Making a difference in bullying: Evaluation of a systemic school-based programme in Canada. In D. Pepler, K. Rigby, & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be? (pp. 125-140). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Plato, & Bluck, R. S. (1961). Meno. Cambridge, UK: University Press.

Rigby, K., Smith, P. K., & Pepler, D. (2004). Working to prevent school bullying: Key issues. In P. K. Smith, D. J. Pepler, & K. Rigby (Eds.), Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be? (pp. 1-12). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rodkin, P. C. (2004). Peer ecologies of aggression and bullying. In Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 87-106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Rogoff, B., Matusov, E., & White, C. (1996). Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching, and schooling. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

Rogoff, B., Turkanis, C. G., & Bartlett, L. (2001). Learning together: Children and adults in a school community. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sartre, J.-P. (1963). Search for a method (1st American ed.). New York: Knopf.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

Schott, R. M., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2014a). Introduction: new approaches to school bullying. In R. M. Schott & D. M. Søndergaard (Eds.), School Bullying: New Theories in Context (pp. 1-17). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Schott, R. M., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2014b). School bullying: New Theories in Context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Sidorkin, A. M. (2002). Learning relations: Impure education, deschooled schools, & dialogue with evil. New York: P. Lang.

Sidorkin, A. M. (2009). Labor of learning: Market and the next generation of educational reform. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Smith, M. P. (2008). Instrumental versus ontological dialogue in education: Why teachers at an innovative school nurture and kill dialogue. Paper presented at the 13th International Mikhaïl Bakhtin Conference, London, Ontario.

Smith, M. P. (2011). The parallel discursive universes of teachers and students. (D.Ed.), University of Delaware, Ann Arbor. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I Database. (3443298)

Smith, M. P. (2019, in preparation). Addressing social exclusion among middle school girls: Social engineering and dialogic approaches.

Smith, M. P., & Matusov, E. (2011). A proposal for a new schooling: Hybrid of reciprocity and authentic dialogue. Review of the book [Sidorkin, A. M. (2002). Learning relations: Impure education, deschooled schools, & dialogue with evil. New York: P. Lang.]. Mind, Culture and Activity, 18, 297-300. doi:10.1080/10749039.2010.503834

Soros, G., Wien, B., & Koenen, K. (1995). Soros on Soros: Staying ahead of the curve. New York: J. Wiley.

Sullivan, P., Smith, M. P., & Matusov, E. (2009). Bakhtin, Socrates and the carnivalesque in education. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 326–342. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2008.12.001

Surprenant, C. W. (2012). Kant's contribution to moral education. In K. Roth & C. W. Surprenant (Eds.), Kant and Education: Interpretations and Commentary (pp. 1-11). New York: Routledge.