Main Article Content
If, as evidence shows, well-founded classroom dialogue improves student engagement and learning, the logical next step is to take it to scale. However, this presumes consensus on definitions and purposes, whereas accounts of dialogue and dialogic teaching/pedagogy/education range from the narrowly technical to the capaciously ontological. This paper extends the agenda by noting the widening gulf between discourse and values within the classroom and outside it, and the particular challenge to both language and democracy of a currently corrosive alliance of digital technology and “post-truth” political rhetoric. Dialogic teaching is arguably an appropriate and promising response, and an essential ingredient of democratic education, but only if it is strengthened by critical engagement with four imperatives whose vulnerability in contemporary public discourse attests to their importance in the classroom, the more so given their problematic nature: language, voice, argument and truth.
 This paper is an edited version of the author’s keynote at the EARLI SIG 20/26 conference Argumentation and inquiry as venues for civic education, held in Jerusalem in October 2018.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
Adamson, S., Alexander, G.R. and Ettenhuber, K. (Eds.). (2007). Renaissance figures of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alexander, R.J. (2001). Culture and pedagogy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Alexander, R.J. (2006). Education as dialogue: Moral and pedagogical choices for a runaway world. Hong Kong and York: Hong Kong Institute of Education with Dialogos.
Alexander, R.J. (2008). Essays on pedagogy. London: Routledge.
Alexander, R.J. (ed). (2010a). Children, their world, their education: Final report and recommendations of the Cambridge Primary Review. London: Routledge.
Alexander, R.J. (2010b). Speaking but not listening? Accountable talk in an unaccountable context, Literacy 44(3), 103-11.
Alexander, R.J. (2014). Evidence, policy and the reform of primary education. Forum 56(3), 349-375.
Alexander, R.J. (2015). Dialogic pedagogy at scale: Oblique perspectives, in Resnick, L.C., Asterhan, C. and Clarke, S. (Eds.), Socialising Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue. Washington DC, AERA, 413-423.
Alexander, R.J. (2017). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (5th edition). York: Dialogos.
Alexander, R.J. (2018). Developing dialogue: Genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 1-38.
Alexander, R.J., Hardman, F., Hardman, J., Longmore, M. and Rajab, T. (2017). Changing talk, changing teaching: Interim report from the in-house evaluation of the CPRT/UoY Dialogic Teaching Project. York: Cambridge Primary Review Trust and University of York. https://www.robinalexander.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Alexander-et-al-EEF-in-house-interim-report-final-170714.pdf
Althusser, L. On the reproduction of capitalism: Ideology and ideological state apparatuses, trans. and ed. G.M. Goshgarian. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
Arendt, H. (2004). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books.
Atkinson, P. and Delamont, M. (1977). Mock-ups and cock-ups: The stage management of guided discovery instruction. In P.Woods and M.Hammersley, School Experience: explorations in the sociology of education. London: Croom Helm, 87-108.
Auden, W.H. (1991). September 1, 1939, in Collected Poems. London: Penguin.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas.
Ball, S.J. (1990). Politics and policy-making in education. London: Routledge.
Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse (Class, codes and control, Vol 4). London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. London: Routledge.
Boyd, M.P. and Markarian, W.C. (2015). Dialogic teaching and dialogic stance: Moving beyond interactional form. Research in the Teaching of English 49(3), 279-296.
Bruner, J.S. (2006). In search of pedagogy, Volume II. London: Routledge.
Carter, R. (1997). Investigating English discourse. London: Routledge.
Castells, M. (1998). End of millennium (The information age: Economy, society and culture, Volume 3). Oxford: Blackwell.
Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth NH, Heinemann.
Committee for Linguistics in Education (2019). Language analysis in schools. http://clie.org.uk/language_analysis/ (Accessed 7.2.19)
Condor, S Tileaga, C., & Billig, M. (2013). Political rhetoric. In L.Huddy, D.O.Sears and J.S.Levy (eds) The Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.013.0009 . (Accessed 7.2.19).
Crystal, D. (2018) The case for language analysis in schools. Paper for the event UKLO and Language Analysis. British Academy, 27 February. http://clie.org.uk/2018-2meeting/ .(Accessed 7.2.19).
Dawes, L., Mercer, N. and Wegerif, R. (2004, 2nd edition). Thinking Together: a programme of activities for developing speaking, listening and thinking skills for children aged 8-11. Birmingham: Imaginative Minds Ltd.
Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280-299.
Dewey, J. (1997).  Democracy and Education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Free Press.
Edwards, A.D. and Westgate, D.P.G. (1994). Investigating classroom talk. London: Falmer Press.
Edwards, J. (1989) Language and disadvantage (2nd edition). London: Cole and Whurr.
Fisher, R. (2008). Teaching Thinking: Philosophical enquiry in the classroom. London: Continuum.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Bloomsbury.
Geertz, C. (1975). The interpretation of cultures London: Hutchinson.
Giroux, H.A. (2011). On critical pedagogy today. London: Bloomsbury.
Gregory, M.R. (2007). Normative dialogue types in philosophy for children. Gifted Education International 22, 160-171.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation, in P.Cole and J.Morgan (eds). Syntax and semantics, Volume 3, Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
Habermas, J. translated by F.Lawrence (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hardy, T. (1916). Far from the madding crowd. London: Macmillan.
Hirsch, E.D. (1988). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. New York: Vintage Books.
Hobsbawm, E. (1995). The age of extremes: The short twentieth century. London: Abacus.
Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356.
House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee (2018). Disinformation and ‘fake News’: Interim report. London: House of Commons.
Jay, T., Taylor, R., Moore, N., Burnett, C., Merchant, G., Thomas, P., Willis, B. and Stevens, A. (2017). Dialogic teaching: Evaluation report and executive summary. London: Education Endowment Foundation with Sheffield Hallam University https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Projects/Evaluation_Reports/Dialogic_Teaching_Evaluation_Report.pdf (accessed 22.1.19).
Joyce, C. (ed). (1988). Leavis and philosophy. Bishopstone: Edgeways Books.
Kakutani, M. (2018). The death of truth. London: William Collins.
Kennedy, G.A. (1999). Classical rhetoric and its Christian and secular tradition. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Kenway, J. (1990). Education and the right’s discursive politics: Private versus state schooling. In S. Ball (Ed.), Foucault and Education: disciplines and knowledge. London: Routledge.
Kessler, G., Rizzo, S. and Kelly, M. (2018). President Trump has made over 5000 false or misleading claims. Washington Post, 13 September.
Kim, M-Y. and Wilkinson, I.A.G. (in press). What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction.
Kuhn, D., Wang, Y. and Li, H. (2011). Why argue? Developing understanding of the purposes and values of argumentative discourse. Discourse Processes 48(1), 26-49.
Lefstein, A., Pollak, I. and Segal, A. (2018). Compelling student voice: dialogic practices of public confession. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, DOI 10.1080/01596306.2018.1473341.
Lefstein, A. and Snell, J. (2014). Better than best practice: Developing teaching and learning through dialogue. London: Routledge.
Levitsky, S, and Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. New York: Crown.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mattingly, C., Lutkehaus, N.C., & Throop, C.J. (2008). Bruner’s search for meaning: A conversation between psychology and anthropology. Ethos, 36(1), 1-28.
Matusov, E. (2018). Mapping dialogic pedagogy: Instrumental and non-instrumental education. In A.Rose and J.Valsiner (eds), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (2nd ed). 274-301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayall, B. (2010). Children’s lives outside school and their educational impact. In R.J.Alexander, C.Doddington, J.Gray, L.Hargreaves and R.Kershner (Eds.), The Cambridge Primary Review research surveys. London: Routledge, 49-82.
McCarthy, M. and Carter, R. (2001). Ten criteria for a spoken grammar. In E.Hinkel and S.Fotos (eds). New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum, 5175.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and Minds: how we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
Mercer, N. and Dawes, L. (2008). The value of exploratory talk. In N.Mercer and S.Hodgkinson (eds). Exploring Talk in School. London: Sage, 55-72.
Mercer, N. and Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: a sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.
Michaels, S. and O’Connor, C. (2012). Talk Science primer. Cambridge MA: TERC.
Michaels, S. and O’Connor, C. (2015). Conceptualizing talk moves as tools: Professional development approaches for academically productive discussions In L.B.Resnick, C.S.C.Asterhan, and S.N.Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington DC: AERA, 347-61.
Michaels, S., O’Connor, C. and Resnick, L.B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283-297.
Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press)
Nystrand, M., with Gamoran, A., Kachur, R. and Prendergast, C. (1997). Opening Dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Ofsted (2018). School inspection handbook. London: Ofsted.
O’Keefe, G.S. and Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011) The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families: American Academy of Pediatrics clinical report. Pediatrics, 127(4). http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/127/4/800 (accessed 6.1.19).
Orwell, G. (1968).  Politics and the English language, in S.Orwell and I.Angos (eds). The collected essays, letters and journalism of George Orwell. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Javonovich, 127-139.
Osborne, J. (2015). The challenges of scale. In L.B.Resnick, C.S.C.Asterhan and S.N.Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington DC: AERA, 403-414.
Park, Michaels, Affolter and O’Connor (2017). Traditions, research and practice supporting academically productive classroom discourse. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, December. Oxford University Press.
Popper, K.R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (eds). (2004), Introducing the grammar of talk. London: QCA.
Resnick, L.B. (2015). Talking to learn: Te promise and challenge of dialogic teaching, in L.B.Resnick, C.S.C.Asterhan and S.N.Clarke (eds). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington DC: AERA, 441-450.
Resnick, L.B., Asterhan, C.S.C. and Clarke, S.N., (2015). Talk, learning and teaching, in L.B.Resnick, C.S.C.Asterhan and S.N.Clarke (Eds) Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington DC: AERA, 1-12.
Resnick, L., Michaels, S. and O’Connor, C. (2010). How (well structured) talk builds the mind, in R.Sternberg and D.Preiss (eds). From genes to context: New discoveries about learning from educational research and their applications. New York: Springer.
Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L., Glina, M., & Anderson, R. C. (2009). Measuring argumentative reasoning: What’s behind the numbers? Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 219-224.
Reznitskaya, A. and Wilkinson, I. (2017). The most reasonable answer: Helping students build better arguments together. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Savage, M. (2019) Health secretary tells social media firms to protect children after girl’s death. The Guardian, 26 January. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/26/matt-hancock-facebook-social-media-suicide-self-harm-young-people. (Accessed 26.1.19).
Schopenhauer, A., ed. A.C.Grayling (2004).  The art of always being right. London: Gibson Square Books.
Schwarz, B.B. and Baker, M.J. (2017). Dialogue, argumentation and education: History, theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Segal, A. and Lefstein, A. (2015). Exuberant voiceless participation: Dialogic sensibilities in the Israeli primary classroom. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 156. London: King’s College.
Segal, A., Pollak, A. and Lefstein, A. (2016). Democracy, voice and dialogic pedagogy: The struggle to be heard and heeded, Language and Education, DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2016.1230124
Simon, J. (1966). Education and society in Tudor England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, A. (2018), quoted in media release from the Edinburgh International Book Festival, 21 August. https://www.edbookfest.co.uk/news/ali-smith-fiction-is-one-of-our-ways-to-get-to-truths-that-are-really-difficult-to-talk-about . (Accessed 24.9.18).
Spender, D. (1980). Man made language. London: Routledge.
Stalin, J. and Wells, H.G. (1937). Marxism vs liberalism: an interview (Transcript of interview in 1934). New York: New Century Publishers.
http://www.rationalrevolution.net/special/library/cc835_44.htm (accessed 24.9.18).
Tanner, M. (1975). Literature and philosophy, New Universities Quarterly, 30:1.
Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Washington Post (2019). The Fact Checker’s ongoing database of the false or misleading claims made by President Trump since assuming office. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ab9ee6608cc8 (accessed 21.1.19).
Walton, D. (2013). Methods of argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Welch, K.E. (1990). The contemporary reception of classical rhetoric: Appropriations of ancient discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wells, H.G. (1920). The outline of history, Vol 2. George Newnes.